Just to clarify, the fsl wrapper is not my work (although I contributed to
the cookbook and one of the standard enhancements in the default .fslrc
file was put in at my behest). I'm just a fan of DIY customization instead
of asking the core devs to add every little feature every user can think
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Michael Richter wrote:
I know that every time I mention this I get silently, perhaps even
hostilely, ignored, but really guys, why not just use fsl for your
customization needs? Colourizing output is in the cookbook:
http://fossil.0branch.com/fsl/wiki?name=Cookbook, along
On Apr 25, 2016 8:48 AM, "Michael Richter" wrote:
>
> I know that every time I mention this I get silently, perhaps even
hostilely, ignored, but really guys, why not just use fsl for your
customization needs?
I don't use fsl myself, though I have no quarrel with its
On 25 April 2016 05:33PM, j. van den hoff wrote:
> @michael: I have been using `fsl' myself happily for several years now. I
> also have tried a couple of times to draw attention to its existence on
> this list (getting the same feedback -- i.e.: none -- as you). but I am
> sure you are mistaken
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 6:42 PM, j. van den hoff
wrote:
> just for the record: `fsl' has been written by marc simpson (and he also
> still hosts the `fsl' repo). so (nearly or completely) all of the core
> functionality of `fsl' (as found on trunk) is due to him, I think.
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 18:03:27 +0200, Stephan Beal
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Steve Schow wrote:
On Apr 25, 2016, at 9:22 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Michael Richter
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Steve Schow wrote:
> On Apr 25, 2016, at 9:22 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Michael Richter
> wrote:
>
>> http://fossil.0branch.com/fsl/wiki?name=Cookbook,
>>
> fwiw,
I’m new to fossil and thanks for pointing out this wrapper tool I’m going to
check it out for sure!
On Apr 25, 2016, at 8:48 AM, Michael Richter wrote:
> I know that every time I mention this I get silently, perhaps even hostilely,
> ignored, but really guys, why not
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 05:22:54PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote:
> > Yes, colorization is commonly-request feature, but is also not trivial to
> > do portably, which is probably why relatively few people are interested
> in
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Steve Schow wrote:
> On Apr 25, 2016, at 9:22 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> Stephan…I’m new here. What do you mean by “dodged a bullet? Is fsl
> something to be afraid of for any reason?
>
No, quite the opposite: colorized
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 05:22:54PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote:
> Yes, colorization is commonly-request feature, but is also not trivial to
> do portably, which is probably why relatively few people are interested in
> implementing it.
Uses terminfo is not that difficult and there are even separate
On Apr 25, 2016, at 9:22 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Michael Richter wrote:
> http://fossil.0branch.com/fsl/wiki?name=Cookbook,
> fwiw, i think you've misconstrued the conventional silence. i've always
>
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 16:48:43 +0200, Michael Richter
wrote:
@michael: I have been using `fsl' myself happily for several years now. I
also have tried a couple of times to draw attention to its existence on
this list (getting the same feedback -- i.e.: none -- as you).
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Michael Richter
wrote:
> I know that every time I mention this I get silently, perhaps even
> hostilely, ignored, but really guys, why not just use fsl for your
> customization needs? Colourizing output is in the cookbook:
>
I know that every time I mention this I get silently, perhaps even
hostilely, ignored, but really guys, why not just use fsl for your
customization needs? Colourizing output is in the cookbook:
http://fossil.0branch.com/fsl/wiki?name=Cookbook, along with lots of other
nifty tricks like aliasing,
For now, if you’re on a unix platform, you can try a wrapper script like this:
#!/bin/bash
export COLOR_NC='^[[0m'
export COLOR_RED='^[[1;31m’
fossil $* |\
sed -e "s/ERROR/${COLOR_RED}ERROR${COLOR_NC}/g” \
sed -e “s/WARNING/${COLOR_RED}WARNING${COLOR_NC}/g”
On Apr 24, 2016, at 4:07 AM,
Possibly the best ‘color-blind proof’ method is reverse video. Not the best
looking in all cases, but certainly effective.
From: Scott Robison
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2016 7:39 PM
To: Fossil SCM user's discussion
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Colored output on console
On Apr 24, 2016 4:07 AM
Hi Scott,
On 24.04.2016 18:39, Scott Robison wrote:
I will just observe here that typically red text on a black background
is really hard for me to see. If someone were to add such a thing,
having it be opt in would be appreciated. Different people have
different, of course. I hate color
On Apr 24, 2016 4:07 AM, "Marko Käning" wrote:
>
> Hi devs,
>
> it would be great if one could colorise Fossil’s output on the console!
>
> Quite a few times I missed an error or warning message which slipped in
between of many lines of the usual fossil output on the
Hi devs,
it would be great if one could colorise Fossil’s output on the console!
Quite a few times I missed an error or warning message which slipped in between
of many lines of the usual fossil output on the console.
Red colouring of words like “warning” or “error” would be very helpful
20 matches
Mail list logo