On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 23:26, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
A lot of people have been telling me that they prefer the unified or
context style in-line diffs over side-by-side diffs. And I have to admit
that sometimes an in-line diff is easier to read and understand. But
side-by-side
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 11:26:16PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
A lot of people have been telling me that they prefer the unified or
context style in-line diffs over side-by-side diffs. And I have to admit
that sometimes an in-line diff is easier to read and understand. But
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 10:54:50PM -0600, Bill Burdick wrote:
I think something like this would help the traditional diff format a
lot: http://www.redmine.org/issues/7139
Bill
Latest changes doesn't something like that?
--
Martin G.
___
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 06:11:42AM -0500, Martin Gagnon wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 10:54:50PM -0600, Bill Burdick wrote:
I think something like this would help the traditional diff format a
lot: http://www.redmine.org/issues/7139
Bill
Latest changes doesn't something like
Sorry -- I didn't explain that. Look at the second highlighted section:
foo = User is shown in light colors both red and green because those
parts of the lines are the same in each version but the parts of the lines
that are different are shown in darker colors.
Bill
2012/2/7 Lluís Batlle i
A lot of people have been telling me that they prefer the unified or
context style in-line diffs over side-by-side diffs. And I have to admit
that sometimes an in-line diff is easier to read and understand. But
side-by-side diffs, especially with the recent enhancements, sometime give
a much
I think something like this would help the traditional diff format a lot:
http://www.redmine.org/issues/7139
Bill
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
A lot of people have been telling me that they prefer the unified or
context style in-line diffs over
7 matches
Mail list logo
