Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

2014-08-09 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Steve Bennett on Fri, 08 Aug 2014 15:55:51 +1000: Are you sure you just changed /home to 711? Worked OK for me: I did some more testing and despite the errors, it does actually build jimsh0: $ ls -l autosetup/jimsh0 ls: autosetup/jimsh0: No such file or directory $

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

2014-08-08 Thread Steve Bennett
On 8 Aug 2014, at 2:34 pm, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said Joe Mistachkin on Thu, 07 Aug 2014 21:14:56 -0700: Yeah, it appears the net change was that Jim Tcl was updated. There are quite a lot of changes to it since the last version. However, I think it should

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

2014-08-08 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Steve Bennett on Fri, 08 Aug 2014 15:55:51 +1000: Are you sure you just changed /home to 711? Yes, I did ``chmod 711 /home'' (as root). That was it. Then I tried to configure and got the errors. I see you are on Linux. I'm on OpenBSD, so perhaps things work a little differently (for

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

2014-08-07 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 1:29 AM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: That has more to do with contemporaneity. When you talk about Linux 3.x, you also necessarily imply recent versions of glibc and such, which is the true dependency. +1 I seriously doubt Fossil actually makes any

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

2014-08-07 Thread Sean Woods
Or you could ask me, since I wrote autosetup :-) I appreciate your assistance and responsiveness. glob.tcl is bundled up in the jimsh0 executable, but you can find it because the source code is there - autosetup/jimsh0.c Some part of the autosetup/configure process is failing because of

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

2014-08-07 Thread Warren Young
On 8/7/2014 01:26, Stephan Beal wrote: i'm pretty certain (not 100%) that that's it, but i know we don't use any Linux-specific calls which might depend on a newer glibc version, After I posted that, I went out and looked for a list of Linux syscalls that included the point where they were

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

2014-08-07 Thread Steve Bennett
On 8 Aug 2014, at 12:52 am, Sean Woods s...@seanwoods.com wrote: Or you could ask me, since I wrote autosetup :-) I appreciate your assistance and responsiveness. glob.tcl is bundled up in the jimsh0 executable, but you can find it because the source code is there - autosetup/jimsh0.c

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

2014-08-07 Thread Steve Bennett
On 8 Aug 2014, at 10:58 am, Steve Bennett ste...@workware.net.au wrote: On 8 Aug 2014, at 12:52 am, Sean Woods s...@seanwoods.com wrote: Or you could ask me, since I wrote autosetup :-) I appreciate your assistance and responsiveness. glob.tcl is bundled up in the jimsh0 executable,

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

2014-08-07 Thread Sean Woods
I have fixed Jim Tcl, updated autosetup, and pushed a new version to the 'autosetup' branch. Please test. If it looks ok, perhaps someone can pull it into trunk. Woo hoo! It works! Bonzer!! swoods@web75:Fossil-93fb7c774f$ ./fossil version This is fossil version 1.25 [93fb7c774f]

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

2014-08-07 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Steve Bennett on Fri, 08 Aug 2014 12:30:52 +1000: I have fixed Jim Tcl, updated autosetup, and pushed a new version to the 'autosetup' branch. Did you intend for the branch to split off of such an old revision of trunk? Thanks, Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 400053e44780

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

2014-08-07 Thread Steve Bennett
On 8 Aug 2014, at 1:43 pm, Andy Bradford amb-sendok-1410061405.efmchampahhhjobco...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said Steve Bennett on Fri, 08 Aug 2014 12:30:52 +1000: I have fixed Jim Tcl, updated autosetup, and pushed a new version to the 'autosetup' branch. Did you intend for the

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

2014-08-07 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Steve Bennett on Fri, 08 Aug 2014 14:00:02 +1000: No. Not sure why that happened. I'm out of practice with fossil. Well, it looks like Joe decided to merge trunk into the branch, so it may not be anything to worry about. I started to look at it and there were a lot of

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

2014-08-07 Thread Joe Mistachkin
Andy Bradford wrote: Well, it looks like Joe decided to merge trunk into the branch, so it may not be anything to worry about. Yeah, it appears the net change was that Jim Tcl was updated. There are quite a lot of changes to it since the last version. However, I think it should be

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

2014-08-07 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Joe Mistachkin on Thu, 07 Aug 2014 21:14:56 -0700: Yeah, it appears the net change was that Jim Tcl was updated. There are quite a lot of changes to it since the last version. However, I think it should be fine merging it to trunk? Any conflicting opinions? No, looks fine now

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

2014-08-07 Thread Steve Bennett
On 8 Aug 2014, at 2:14 pm, Joe Mistachkin sql...@mistachkin.com wrote: Andy Bradford wrote: Well, it looks like Joe decided to merge trunk into the branch, so it may not be anything to worry about. Yeah, it appears the net change was that Jim Tcl was updated. There are quite a

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

2014-08-06 Thread Steve Bennett
On 6 Aug 2014, at 2:08 pm, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: On 8/5/2014 18:50, Sean Woods wrote: I saw that jimsh references glob.tcl, so I removed all my local Tcl/Tk stuff -- I wasn't really using it -- and rebuilt Fossil clean from tip, to force it to use jimsh, and it still

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

2014-08-05 Thread Warren Young
On 8/3/2014 15:01, Sean Woods wrote: What is the latest version of Fossil that will run on the 2.6.x line of Linux kernels? I regularly run Fossil on CentOS 5, which still ships kernel 2.6.18. Can't compile off trunk and I don't know why. We don't know why, either, since you didn't include

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

2014-08-05 Thread Sean Woods
What is the latest version of Fossil that will run on the 2.6.x line of Linux kernels? I regularly run Fossil on CentOS 5, which still ships kernel 2.6.18. As do I. Can't compile off trunk and I don't know why. We don't know why, either, since you didn't include the error message

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

2014-08-05 Thread Warren Young
On 8/5/2014 16:11, Sean Woods wrote: Can't compile off trunk and I don't know why. We don't know why, either, since you didn't include the error message you got. That error message was pasted in another thread. I don't read every thread on every mailing list I subscribe to. I'm sure I'm

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

2014-08-05 Thread Sean Woods
$ mkdir skull # fossil head, get it? Ahahaha. $ cd skull $ fossil open /museum/fossil.fossil # where fossils live Clever! I saw that jimsh references glob.tcl, so I removed all my local Tcl/Tk stuff -- I wasn't really using it -- and rebuilt Fossil clean

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

2014-08-05 Thread Warren Young
On 8/5/2014 18:50, Sean Woods wrote: I saw that jimsh references glob.tcl, so I removed all my local Tcl/Tk stuff -- I wasn't really using it -- and rebuilt Fossil clean from tip, to force it to use jimsh, and it still doesn't happen. How did you do this? My knowledge of the TCL ecosystem

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

2014-08-03 Thread David Given
On 8/3/14, 11:01 PM, Sean Woods wrote: What is the latest version of Fossil that will run on the 2.6.x line of Linux kernels? I need this in order to run Fossil on my shared host. See yesterday's conversation about filenames with a question mark in them. Can't compile off trunk and I don't

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

2014-08-03 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Sean Woods on Sun, 03 Aug 2014 17:01:41 -0400: Can't compile off trunk and I don't know why. What about compiling a release version? http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?t=release The latest is 1.29. If that compiles while trunk does not, then there's a problem to

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

2014-08-03 Thread Richard Hipp
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Sean Woods s...@seanwoods.com wrote: What is the latest version of Fossil that will run on the 2.6.x line of Linux kernels? Probably the tip of trunk. If ./configure isn't working for you, then make a copy of Makefile.classic into Makefile and hand-edit that

Re: [fossil-users] Linux 2.6 :-(

2014-08-03 Thread Sean Woods
If ./configure isn't working for you, then make a copy of Makefile.classic into Makefile and hand-edit that file to get it to do what you want.  It isn't hard. Excellent, that did the trick. Now everything is as it should be. Thank you! ___