Hi list;
Today I opened one of my repos, and expected to see some stuff that is in
'trunk'. However, it was empty as the day it was born. I could see all my
branches via 'branches', and could update to them, but when I would update
to 'trunk' it would always be empty. Odd, I thought, I'm
Hi Dave.
This is a fork (unintentional branch). It would happen (for example)
if two different clones of a repository are updated independently of
each other, and then sync'd. You can merge the errant trunk back to
the good trunk without ill effect (minding you might have to do
conflict
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:29 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a fork (unintentional branch). It would happen (for example)
if two different clones of a repository are updated independently of
each other, and then sync'd. You can merge the errant trunk back to
The weird thing
Thus said Stephan Beal on Thu, 02 Oct 2014 19:31:12 +0200:
The weird thing is, he's got two initial empty commits. i'm at a
loss to explain that.
Seems that one of them must have been created with an older fossil and
the other created with a newer version from Fossil's trunk
On Oct 2, 2014 11:14 AM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote:
Thus said Stephan Beal on Thu, 02 Oct 2014 19:31:12 +0200:
The weird thing is, he's got two initial empty commits. i'm at a
loss to explain that.
Seems that one of them must have been created with an older fossil
: fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org
[mailto:fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org] On Behalf
Of B Harder
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 12:29 PM
To: Fossil SCM user's discussion
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] I have two trunks?
Hi Dave.
This is a fork (unintentional branch
-Original Message-
From: fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org
[mailto:fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org] On Behalf
Of Andy Bradford
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 1:15 PM
To: Stephan Beal
Cc: Fossil SCM user's discussion
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] I have two
On 10/2/2014 10:31 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: The weird thing is, he's got
two initial empty commits. i'm at a loss
to explain that.
http://chiselapp.com/user/ziggurat29/repository/z29-3rdParty/timeline
I think I can partly explain the two initial empty commits part, or at
least show off
Bingo.
On 10/2/2014 11:33 AM, dave wrote:
I'm tending to suspect not (additional trunk at creation) for a reason that
I will soon make clear, but the 'version mismatch' hypothesis is
interesting. Fyi, the creation process went like this:
* I created my repo locally, with current (v1.29,
Thus said B Harder on Thu, 02 Oct 2014 11:17:23 -0700:
Is that even possible? I thought the repo would have to be created
once (and only once), generating it's repo-id, and then cloned for all
subsequent copies before things can begin deviating.
The project-id is stored in a table in a
...
Thus said B Harder on Thu, 02 Oct 2014 11:17:23 -0700:
Is that even possible? I thought the repo would have to
be created
once (and only once), generating it's repo-id, and then
cloned for all
subsequent copies before things can begin deviating.
The project-id is stored in
2014-10-02 20:54 GMT+02:00 Andy Bradford:
The project-id is stored in a table in a database---it can be changed. I
suspect that this is how Chiselapp actually allows you to sync a new
repository to their site in some configurations. Because the act of
creating a new repository
If it helps:
I tried something very simple (in this example:
https://chiselapp.com/user/rberteig/repository/WPCLI/home), and it
apparently fixed the problem in cloned copy at least.
I shunned the empty initial checking, rebuilt, and re-enabled the artifact
(just in case).
The timeline
-Original Message-
From: fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org
[mailto:fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org] On Behalf
Of to...@acm.org
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 2:58 PM
To: Fossil SCM user's discussion
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] I have two trunks
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 2:33 PM, dave d...@ziggurat29.com wrote:
* Its big, so chisel can't import it, but they have a feature where you
explicitly supply the project id, and then you can sync your big repo into
it. So I did that.
When I did have a repo on Chisel, I didn't notice this
-Original Message-
From: fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org
[mailto:fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org] On Behalf Of Ron W
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 3:35 PM
To: Fossil SCM user's discussion
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] I have two trunks?
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 2:33
On 10/2/2014 12:57 PM, to...@acm.org wrote:
I tried something very simple (in this example:
https://chiselapp.com/user/rberteig/repository/WPCLI/home), and it
apparently fixed the problem in cloned copy at least.
I shunned the empty initial checking, rebuilt, and re-enabled the
artifact
17 matches
Mail list logo
