Re: [FOSSology] RHEL5 RPM fossology-1.1.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm broken? Urgent please...

Ma, Dong (vinc...@bas-becom-bj) said on Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 01:50:22AM +: > I have a work around to install fossology on rhel5 x86_64: > 1. Add /usr/lib64/libextractor directory to /etc/ld.so.conf If fossology *depends* on an external missing package, then it should be in the Requires

Re: [FOSSology] RHEL5 RPM fossology-1.1.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm broken? Urgent please...

Thanks Vincent. It FIXED IT I tried changing paths for /usr/lib/libextractor to /usr/lib64/libextrator and it wasn't working. I also just before you replied saw this with basically the same fix/answer you sent me (*http://www.mail-archive.com/fossology@fossology.org/msg00030.html*

Re: [FOSSology] RHEL5 RPM fossology-1.1.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm broken? Urgent please...

/lib/fossology/agents/License.bsam: No such file or directory >> Please advise, pretty please =/ >> >> -Gibran >> >> >-- next part -- >An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >URL: ><http://fossology.org/pipermail/fossology/attachment

Re: [FOSSology] RHEL5 RPM fossology-1.1.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm broken? Urgent please...

Thanks but still hanging on pkmetagetta initialization with fossinit: r...@san-psip fossology_install]# /usr/bin/fossinit Applying database schema Applying database functions Migrating database records Removing obsolete views Removing obsolete columns Committing changes... Purging cach

Re: [FOSSology] RHEL5 RPM fossology-1.1.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm broken? Urgent please...

You're right; you MUST have a generated License.bsam file to run fossology. Unfortunately, as Ralph pointed out earlier in this thread: The issue is that the RPM (and perhaps .deb as well?) fails to fully install, because of pkgmetagetta being called in the postinstall script. If the script si

Re: [FOSSology] RHEL5 RPM fossology-1.1.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm broken? Urgent please...

Someone else can chime in on how to do this the official way (probably fo_postinstall), but you can also build it from source. fossology/agents/foss_license_agent/Licenses/mkselftestcache Bob On Feb 25, 2010, at 4:57 PM, Furosh One wrote: > Anyone know how to get around the License.bsam agen

Re: [FOSSology] RHEL5 RPM fossology-1.1.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm broken? Urgent please...

Anyone know how to get around the License.bsam agent not being in /var/lib/fossology/agents directory? Can I download this from somewhere or copy it from my other machine (ubuntu 9.04) and place it on this server (rhel5 x86_64)? I would suspect not but can't start fossology due to this error (so

Re: [FOSSology] RHEL5 RPM fossology-1.1.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm broken? Urgent please...

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 06:54:46PM +, Gobeille, Robert wrote: > > Thanks Ralph. I understand why you are trying to do this. I was probably > unclear. What I would like to know is if you ever use (i.e. ever look at the > results from) the pkgmetagetta agent. So far, no, but I am just gettin

Re: [FOSSology] RHEL5 RPM fossology-1.1.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm broken? Urgent please...

> > The issue is that the RPM (and perhaps .deb as well?) fails > to fully install, because of pkgmetagetta being called in the > postinstall script. > > If the script simply printed a warning and continued on, it > would be fine. But right now you end up with an incomplete > and non-functi

Re: [FOSSology] RHEL5 RPM fossology-1.1.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm broken? Urgent please...

On Feb 25, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Ralph Siemsen wrote: > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 04:20:23PM +, Gobeille, Robert wrote: >> >> So do you use the data from the pkgmetagetta agent, or are you just going >> through this because you need fossology to build? > > The issue is that the RPM (and perhaps

Re: [FOSSology] RHEL5 RPM fossology-1.1.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm broken? Urgent please...

Couple of things I found trying to troubleshoot my issues: 1). The License.bsam agent isn't in there: == [r...@san-psip fossology_install]# ls /var/lib/fossology/agents/License.bsam ls: /var/lib/fossology/agents/License.bsam: No such file or directory 2). pk

Re: [FOSSology] RHEL5 RPM fossology-1.1.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm broken? Urgent please...

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 04:20:23PM +, Gobeille, Robert wrote: > > So do you use the data from the pkgmetagetta agent, or are you just going > through this because you need fossology to build? The issue is that the RPM (and perhaps .deb as well?) fails to fully install, because of pkgmetagett

Re: [FOSSology] RHEL5 RPM fossology-1.1.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm broken? Urgent please...

I realize you need libextractor to get fossology working, but I'm curious, do you actually need or use the (pkgmetagetta) agent? That's the only agent that needs libextractor. It's used to grab meta data from different files (like exif headers from jpg's, etc). Fossology can display this da

Re: [FOSSology] RHEL5 RPM fossology-1.1.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm broken? Urgent please...

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 09:47:49AM -0500, Ralph Siemsen wrote: > > I was able to work around the issue by setting an explicit library > search path. Of course this is not a "proper" solution: > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/libextractor rpm -i fossology- Note that on x86_64 you'll need to use /

Re: [FOSSology] RHEL5 RPM fossology-1.1.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm broken? Urgent please...

On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:07:44PM -0800, Furosh One wrote: > FATAL: Failed to load default extractor libraries. > FATAL: '/usr/lib/fossology/agents/pkgmetagetta -i' failed to initialize I ran into this as well. The libextractor package in RHEL/Fedora have a long-standing bug that was only recen