Re: [FOSSology] Wondering which are OSI approved licenses

2011-02-11 Thread Jeroen Baten
Hi, I found the page on buckets and see that it is a 'work in progess'. No problem. I will see if I can help. Thanks for the heads-up. kind regards, On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 20:36 +0200, Raino Lintulampi wrote: Hi Jeroen, I think buckets are what you are looking for. With buckets you can

Re: [FOSSology] Weird scan of fossology-1.3.0.tar.gz fails Package Scan

2011-02-11 Thread Jeroen Baten
Don't know if this helps, but this is a relevant piece of the log: 2011-02-10 13:42:27 scheduler[716] : Child[15] 'agent=pkgagent host=localhost ' state=SPAWNED(4) @ Thu Feb 10 13:42:27 2011 2011-02-10 13:42:27 scheduler[716] : Child[15] 'agent=pkgagent host=localhost ' state=READY(5) @ Thu Feb

Re: [FOSSology] Weird scan of fossology-1.3.0.tar.gz fails Package Scan

2011-02-11 Thread Bob Gobeille
This was supposed to be fixed on January 13. http://bugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=596 1.3.0 was released January 19. Mary, did this fix get into 1.3.0? Bob Gobeille On Feb 11, 2011, at 1:47 AM, Jeroen Baten wrote: Don't know if this helps, but this is a relevant piece of the log:

Re: [FOSSology] Weird scan of fossology-1.3.0.tar.gz fails Package Scan

2011-02-11 Thread Laser, Mary
The fix for the bug referenced below (#596) is in 1.3.0. However, I don't think that bug is the same problem Jeroen is having, based on what I see below. The problem description for #596 includes: On fedora/rhel system, ununpack agent get the wrong mimetype for debian binary package, it set

Re: [FOSSology] Wondering which are OSI approved licenses

2011-02-11 Thread Bob Gobeille
Everything is a work in progress. ;-) But buckets are used today. The only work going on with buckets is a new tool that lets you compare buckets between files. Bob Gobeille On Feb 11, 2011, at 1:45 AM, Jeroen Baten wrote: Hi, I found the page on buckets and see that it is a 'work in