Re: [FOSSology] Drop support for RHEL5 in FOSSology 2.0?
We wouldn't be able to upgrade any time soon. Our IT department is probably a year out from allowing RHEL 6. This wouldn't be a big deal if 1.4.1 remains supported and big fixes are done, but if all such support drops shortly after 2.0 is out, we will have difficulty. From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology-boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Laser, Mary Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 2:56 PM To: fossology@fossology.org Subject: [FOSSology] Drop support for RHEL5 in FOSSology 2.0? Hello FOSSologists, We are deep into development test of FOSSology version 2.0 http://fossology.org/v2.0 and making good progress. A large part of 2.0 is a complete rewrite of the scheduler with a new dependency on libglib2.0-dev, version 2.23.0 or greater. We recently discovered the newest available version of glib in RHEL5 does not meet this requirement. We would like to consider dropping support for RHEL5 with FOSSology 2.0. This would require all current FOSSology users running under RHEL5 to upgrade to RHEL6. Please respond to this email Will this affect your FOSSology installation? Please respond to this email with your comments feedback. Thanks. The FOSSology Project http://fossology.orghttp://fossology.org/ ___ fossology mailing list fossology@fossology.org http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
Re: [FOSSology] 1.2.1 to 1.4?
Okay. I added p7zip-plugins which was needed and ran rpm -Uvh fossology-1.3...rpm and got the following error: # rpm -Uvh fossology-1.3.0-1.el5.i386.rpm Preparing...### [100%] 1:fossology ### [100%] error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/lib/fossology/agents/copyright: cpio: rename failed - Is a directory Any ideas? From: Laser, Mary [mailto:mary.la...@hp.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 10:47 AM To: Fay Michael T; 'fossology@fossology.org' Subject: RE: 1.2.1 to 1.4? Hi Michael, We have not tested this. To be safe, I would do as this fossology (rpm) user proposed: I'll backup the database (filesystem level backup plus a dump of the database. Then can I simply perform an rpm -Uvh fossology-1.3.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm followed by a rpm -Uvh fossology-1.4.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm Also, Be sure to start the scheduler after upgrade #1. Bring up the UI and browse your repository to verify all is well before proceeding with the 1.4.0 upgrade. Please let us know how it goes. Thanks, Mary -Original Message- From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology- boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Fay Michael T Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 8:49 AM To: 'fossology@fossology.org' Subject: [FOSSology] 1.2.1 to 1.4? Has upgrading from 1.2.1 to 1.4 been tested? Or do you really need to go to 3 and then to 4? ___ fossology mailing list fossology@fossology.org http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology ___ fossology mailing list fossology@fossology.org http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
Re: [FOSSology] 1.2.1 to 1.4?
Thanks all! I will rename the directory and run it again. From: fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology-boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Mark Donohoe Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 1:37 PM To: fossology@fossology.org Subject: Re: [FOSSology] 1.2.1 to 1.4? Ray and Michael, This is an RPM issue. On debian that directory gets removed before the install. Ray is correct. The old copyright directory is still there and should either be renamed or just removed. In 1.3.0 Fossology replaced the copyright agent with a newer one that no longer used the directory of the 1.2.1 version. It's too late now, but our RPM's should have checked for that and removed it... Hope that helps. Micheal, you are ALMOST there! Keep at it. On 06/01/2011 11:25 AM, Westphal, Raymond W wrote: I forgot about that. Yes, I had a similar error. I renamed the copyright directory to copyright.OLD and tried again. And after the install there was an issue with an unusually named copyright directory. So you may want to check for another copyright. (X can be 0-9 or a-z) directory that was created around the time of the first install and remove it. Mary may recall why that weird copyright directory caused an issue. Ray W. From: fossology-boun...@fossology.orgmailto:fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology-boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Fay Michael T Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 12:35 PM To: 'fossology@fossology.orgmailto:fossology@fossology.org' Subject: Re: [FOSSology] 1.2.1 to 1.4? Okay. I added p7zip-plugins which was needed and ran rpm -Uvh fossology-1.3...rpm and got the following error: # rpm -Uvh fossology-1.3.0-1.el5.i386.rpm Preparing...### [100%] 1:fossology ### [100%] error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/lib/fossology/agents/copyright: cpio: rename failed - Is a directory Any ideas? From: Laser, Mary [mailto:mary.la...@hp.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 10:47 AM To: Fay Michael T; 'fossology@fossology.orgmailto:fossology@fossology.org' Subject: RE: 1.2.1 to 1.4? Hi Michael, We have not tested this. To be safe, I would do as this fossology (rpm) user proposed: I'll backup the database (filesystem level backup plus a dump of the database. Then can I simply perform an rpm -Uvh fossology-1.3.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm followed by a rpm -Uvh fossology-1.4.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm Also, Be sure to start the scheduler after upgrade #1. Bring up the UI and browse your repository to verify all is well before proceeding with the 1.4.0 upgrade. Please let us know how it goes. Thanks, Mary -Original Message- From: fossology-boun...@fossology.orgmailto:fossology-boun...@fossology.org [mailto:fossology- boun...@fossology.orgmailto:boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Fay Michael T Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 8:49 AM To: 'fossology@fossology.orgmailto:fossology@fossology.org' Subject: [FOSSology] 1.2.1 to 1.4? Has upgrading from 1.2.1 to 1.4 been tested? Or do you really need to go to 3 and then to 4? ___ fossology mailing list fossology@fossology.orgmailto:fossology@fossology.org http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed and may contain confidential and privileged information protected by law. If you received this e-mail in error, any review, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of the e-mail is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies from your system. ___ fossology mailing list fossology@fossology.orgmailto:fossology@fossology.org http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology -- --- Mark Donohoe OSPO, HP FOSSology.org ___ fossology mailing list fossology@fossology.org http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
[FOSSology] 1.2.1 to 1.4?
Has upgrading from 1.2.1 to 1.4 been tested? Or do you really need to go to 3 and then to 4? ___ fossology mailing list fossology@fossology.org http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
[FOSSology] RHEL 5 rpms?
Any idea when the RHEL 5 rpms for 1.4 will be ready? I looked today and didn't see one. ___ fossology mailing list fossology@fossology.org http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
[FOSSology] php configuration question
Does Fossology need to have expose_php=On in the php.ini file? There is a current php vulnerability related to this that I would like to shut off. ___ fossology mailing list fossology@fossology.org http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
Re: [FOSSology] errors after upgrading to 1.2
RHEL 5.4 and I used the redhat package. From: Bob Gobeille [mailto:bob.gobei...@hp.com] Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 3:06 PM To: Fay Michael T Cc: 'fossology@fossology.org' Subject: Re: [FOSSology] errors after upgrading to 1.2 It looks like your upgrade to 1.2 didn't completely work. The error you just sent says the bucketpool table doesn't exist. Creating it is part of the upgrade process. What OS are you using and how did you do the upgrade? Bob On Sep 20, 2010, at 1:29 PM, Fay Michael T wrote: I went to edit the users and got this error: File: /usr/share/fossology/www/common/common-buckets.php, Line number: 52 ERROR: relation bucketpool does not exist select * from bucketpool where active='Y' #0 debugbacktrace() called at [/usr/share/fossology/www/common/common-ui.php:117] #1 DBCheckResult(, select * from bucketpool where active='Y', /usr/share/fossology/www/common/common-buckets.php, 52) called at [/usr/share/fossology/www/common/common-buckets.php:52] #2 SelectBucketPool() called at [/usr/share/fossology/www/plugins/user-edit-self.php:274] #3 user_edit_self-Output() called at [/usr/share/fossology/www/index.php:44] I'm logged in as fossy...But this confuses me as my test was obviously able to log in... From: Bob Gobeille [mailto:bob.gobei...@hp.com] Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 2:17 PM To: Fay Michael T Cc: 'fossology@fossology.orgmailto:'fossology@fossology.org' Subject: Re: [FOSSology] errors after upgrading to 1.2 Hi Michael, I suspect this user does not have any default agents. Update your account settings and make sure at least one of the default agents is checked. Let me know if this fixes it. If it does I'll file a bug. Bob Gobeille On Sep 20, 2010, at 12:42 PM, Fay Michael T wrote: Hi, We are getting errors after having upgraded to v1.2. I have included screen shots of the errors: Uploading Fatal error after clicking upload.JPG Uploading Fatal error.JPG Does anyone have any ideas here? Thanks, Michael ATT1..txt ___ fossology mailing list fossology@fossology.org http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
[FOSSology] Upgrade or new install
Does fossology 1.2 install as an upgrade to 1.1 or do I need to do a new install? If it's a new install, can 1.2 run side by side with 1.1? ___ fossology mailing list fossology@fossology.org http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
Re: [FOSSology] Upgrade or new install
Will the red hat rpms work okay, or should I plan on installing from source? -Original Message- From: Mark Donohoe [mailto:mark.dono...@hp.com] Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 12:26 PM To: Fay Michael T Cc: 'fossology@fossology.org' Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Upgrade or new install Fay Michael T wrote: Does fossology 1.2 install as an upgrade to 1.1 or do I need to do a new install? If it's a new install, can 1.2 run side by side with 1.1? ___ fossology mailing list fossology@fossology.org http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology Michael, You should be able to upgrade from 1.1 to 1.2 using either the deb packages or the tar ball. We do not recommend trying to run 1.1 and 1.2 at the same time as they both share the same data base and the tables have changed between 1.1 and 1.2. Hope that answers your question, if not, please post again. Thanks for using FOSSology. -- Mark Donohoe OST, Cupertino CA. fossology.org ___ fossology mailing list fossology@fossology.org http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
