Re: [FOSSology] Survey - for next version of FOSSology

2009-08-10 Thread Bob Gobeille
On Aug 10, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Matt Taggart wrote: Are you saying you would rather move it to a separate package than remove it from the main package? I'm saying it should remain the the upstream fossology tarball, but for Debian I can put it in a separate package that won't be required

Re: [FOSSology] Survey - for next version of FOSSology

2009-08-10 Thread Laser, Mary
I agree. We did it mostly as an example to show our potential. But now I'm thinking that we shouldn't have released it until we actually use the data. Right now it's a cost with no benefit unless people are doing direct db queries or are counting on a UI to use it in the future. The