Does fossology 1.2 install as an upgrade to 1.1 or do I need to do a new
install? If it's a new install, can 1.2 run side by side with 1.1?
___
fossology mailing list
fossology@fossology.org
http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
Will the red hat rpms work okay, or should I plan on installing from source?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Donohoe [mailto:mark.dono...@hp.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 12:26 PM
To: Fay Michael T
Cc: 'fossology@fossology.org'
Subject: Re: [FOSSology] Upgrade or new install
Fay
RHEL 5.4 and I used the redhat package.
From: Bob Gobeille [mailto:bob.gobei...@hp.com]
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 3:06 PM
To: Fay Michael T
Cc: 'fossology@fossology.org'
Subject: Re: [FOSSology] errors after upgrading to 1.2
It looks like your upgrade to 1.2 didn't completely work
Does Fossology need to have expose_php=On in the php.ini file? There is a
current php vulnerability related to this that I would like to shut off.
___
fossology mailing list
fossology@fossology.org
http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
Any idea when the RHEL 5 rpms for 1.4 will be ready? I looked today and didn't
see one.
___
fossology mailing list
fossology@fossology.org
http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
Has upgrading from 1.2.1 to 1.4 been tested? Or do you really need to go to 3
and then to 4?
___
fossology mailing list
fossology@fossology.org
http://fossology.org/mailman/listinfo/fossology
### [100%]
error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/lib/fossology/agents/copyright:
cpio: rename failed - Is a directory
Any ideas?
From: Laser, Mary [mailto:mary.la...@hp.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 10:47 AM
To: Fay Michael T; 'fossology@fossology.org'
Subject: RE: 1.2.1 to 1.4
copyright directory caused an issue.
Ray W.
From: fossology-boun...@fossology.orgmailto:fossology-boun...@fossology.org
[mailto:fossology-boun...@fossology.org] On Behalf Of Fay Michael T
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 12:35 PM
To: 'fossology
We wouldn't be able to upgrade any time soon. Our IT department is probably a
year out from allowing RHEL 6. This wouldn't be a big deal if 1.4.1 remains
supported and big fixes are done, but if all such support drops shortly after
2.0 is out, we will have difficulty.
From:
9 matches
Mail list logo