James Rigg wrote:
does seem to be referring to not just content, but also the
running of Wikipedia. But the 'private' mailing lists which now
exist seem to be a departure from this.
Departure from what? From your original imagination, or from some
policy that was posted (where? when?
2009/1/11 geni geni...@gmail.com:
2009/1/11 Amir E. Aharoni amir.ahar...@gmail.com:
2009/1/11 Jon Harald Søby jhs...@gmail.com:
Also, I'd like to know what's the progress of renaming the subdomain mo
to
mo-cyrl mo.wikipedia.org - mo-cyrl.wikipedia.org, as was stated in
november last year,
Marcus Buck wrote:
Tim Starling hett schreven:
Marcus Buck wrote:
In the Arabic world there's a prevalent POV, that Arabs form one nation
united by the use of the Arabic language. But in reality Standard Arabic
is something like Latin. With the difference, that Latin fell out of
2009/1/12 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com:
We only accept one Wikipedia for one language. The fact that we still have
what is called the be-tarask.wikipedia.org is only because people were of
the opinion that we should retain the work that was done. Now I wonder what
more experts
Ray Saintonge hett schreven:
That's an outrageous assumption. Canadians who attend an international
sporting event between Americans and any other country will most often
cheer for the other country. Since 1959 Canada has never broken
diplomatic relations with Cuba, and has not
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Marcus Buck m...@marcusbuck.org wrote:
Ray Saintonge hett schreven:
That's an outrageous assumption. Canadians who attend an international
sporting event between Americans and any other country will most often
cheer for the other country. Since 1959 Canada
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Charlotte Webb
charlottethew...@gmail.comwrote:
what i meant to say is. at least the english site is still accessible,
which is odd (i mis-read the subject line) because the latter site has
quite a bit more anti-PRC content. weird...
Indeed there is a bit more
As another historical note from Wikimania 2008 ...
In our session (of mine and Arria Belli) which focused on translation,
a girl who seemed to be Arabic but not known to me from where she came
asked me if there would be a possibility of āmmiyya Wikipedias. I
don't know which āmmiyya she cared for
2009/1/12 Anthony wikim...@inbox.org:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
If, by terms of service of Wikipedia, we ask
contributors to give permission to be attributed by URL under certain
circumstances, this is consistent with the language of CC-BY-SA, and
2009/1/12 Anthony wikim...@inbox.org:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
If, by terms of service of Wikipedia, we ask
contributors to give permission to be attributed by URL under certain
circumstances, this is consistent with the language of CC-BY-SA, and
2009/1/12 Anthony wikim...@inbox.org:
It most certainly is a requirement of the GFDL (not sure what your
weasel-word of direct is supposed to mean).
The GFDL requires crediting principal authors, and it requires change
tracking. Given the obvious intent of the principal authors clause to
limit
11 matches
Mail list logo
