Mike Linksvayer wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
> wrote:
>
>> So at the very minimum, it would well serve us to know what the
>> established standards are within CC-BY-SA, in particular focusing
>> on the "BY" part.
>>
>
> As others have pointed out on this
Hi Lennart,
I attended one of their conferences, OKCON, in London a couple of
years ago. I was also involved with one of their projects, Open
Shakespeare. They do a lot of work on open knowledge definitions and
license compatibility. They are also involved in developing tools and
in pushing specif
OKFN hosted an open-textbooks meeting on IRC a while back. I attended,
and I think one or two other Wikibookians attended as well. I haven't
had any contact with them since, but I've wanted to either host or
join another similar meeting with them in the future.
--Andrew Whitworth
On Mon, Jan 26,
Geoffrey Plourde wrote:
> You are beating on a dead horse. Mr. Vibber has brought forth a list of
> perfectly valid reasons why this space was taken. LET ME REITERATE THE COST
> OF REWIRING/RECONFIGURING SPACE IN CALIFORNIA. Why should a taco stand use a
> dry cleaning shop when it can get anoth
Thomas Dalton hett schreven:
> 2009/1/26 Gregory Kohs :
>
>> Over here
>> http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Benefactors/De#Major_benefactors_.28.2450.2C000_or_more.29
>>
>> ...the Wikimedia Foundation gives credit to "the Stanton Foundation".
>> It's my learning that "the Stanton Foundatio
Thomas Dalton says:
Given that the WMF will have had substantial communications with them
for some time before getting the money, I think it's highly unlikely
WMF would get their name wrong. What gives you the idea that the
Stanton Foundation is a small Michigan non-profit?
++
For these r
2009/1/26 Gregory Kohs :
> Over here
> http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Benefactors/De#Major_benefactors_.28.2450.2C000_or_more.29
>
> ...the Wikimedia Foundation gives credit to "the Stanton Foundation".
> It's my learning that "the Stanton Foundation" is a small non-profit
> located in Jac
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
wrote:
> WMF used to really be a (choose a heavy-weight designation) pound
> gorilla in the GFDL users pool.
>
> When we transition to the Creative Commons universe, we will
> never again regain that status, and a combative stance will
> do us
Over here
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Benefactors/De#Major_benefactors_.28.2450.2C000_or_more.29
...the Wikimedia Foundation gives credit to "the Stanton Foundation".
It's my learning that "the Stanton Foundation" is a small non-profit
located in Jackon, Michigan. However, "The Ruth a
David Gerard wrote:
> 2009/1/24 The Cunctator :
>
>
>> I'm not sure why we're so stressed out about getting things exactly legally
>> right, since once edit histories for anything created before 2002 / late
>> 2001 were wiped out, any of those articles don't have an accurate author
>> list.
>>
They have Benjamin Mako Hill in their advisory board, who is also in the WMF
AB. Other then that, I see nothing familiar.
Best regards,
Lodewijk
2009/1/26 Lennart Guldbrandsson
> Hello,
>
> I was recently made aware of this organization: http://www.okfn.org/ with
> their blog at http://blog.o
Hello,
I was recently made aware of this organization: http://www.okfn.org/ with
their blog at http://blog.okfn.org/
Have any of you had anything to do with them?
Best wishes,
Lennart
--
Lennart Guldbrandsson, chair of Wikimedia Sverige and press contact for
Swedish Wikipedia // ordförande
12 matches
Mail list logo
