On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:26 PM, David Gerarddger...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be a simple matter of programming to have something that
allows upload of encumbered video and audio formats and re-encode them
as Ogg Theora or Ogg Vorbis. It would greatly add to how much stuff we
get, as it would
[cc'd back to wikitech-l]
2009/6/8 Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org:
It's been discussed since OggHandler was invented in 2007, and I've
always been in favour of it. But the code hasn't materialised, despite
a Google Summer of Code project come and gone that was meant to
implement a
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 17:26, David Gerarddger...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be a simple matter of programming to have something that
allows upload of encumbered video and audio formats and re-encode them
as Ogg Theora or Ogg Vorbis.
As a technical sidenote, it should be mentioned that recoding
2009/6/8 Peter Gervai g...@grin.hu:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 17:26, David Gerarddger...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be a simple matter of programming to have something that
allows upload of encumbered video and audio formats and re-encode them
as Ogg Theora or Ogg Vorbis.
As a technical
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 14:54, David Gerarddger...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, yeah. But until cameras or phones start recording Ogg Theora
natively, we're likely stuck with this.
As another tidbit, I have a music player (mp3 player) which records
and plays ogg (not Theora though). :-)
But you're
Peter Gervai wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 17:26, David Gerarddger...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be a simple matter of programming to have something that
allows upload of encumbered video and audio formats and re-encode them
as Ogg Theora or Ogg Vorbis.
As a technical sidenote, it should be
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=30848
Free tuition, admission fee, testing fee. No word on freedom of
materials. Anyone know more about details of this? Something we can
help with?
- d.
___
foundation-l mailing list
University website: http://www.uopeople.org
Currently providing two academic programs; computer science track and
business admin. Enrollment deadline for fall semester hasn't yet
passed!!
Regards,
Moushira
On 6/8/09, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/8 Moushira Elamrawy moushi...@gmail.com:
University website: http://www.uopeople.org
Currently providing two academic programs; computer science track and
business admin. Enrollment deadline for fall semester hasn't yet
passed!!
[T]he University of the People does not presently confer
News article linked in the first post said they'd already enrolled over 200
students; FAQ says its capped at 300, so I imagine its reached its cap by
now.
Moushira wrote: Enrollment deadline for fall semester hasn't yet
passed!!
~Nathan
___
Couldn't the stats job you want run on toolserver?
Peter Gervai wrote:
Hello,
I wasn't subscribed to this list, since I usually try to avoid the
politics around.
I was notified, however, that some interesting claims were made and
some steps taken (again) without any discussion
We have been talking about how we survived being blocked by the Chinese
government during the last June 4th ban but now this is on the table. We
have to see how this will now affect us.
June 9, 2009
China Requires Censoring Software on New PCs
By ANDREW JACOBS
BEIJING — China has issued a
Hi!
Couldn't the stats job you want run on toolserver?
Really, this isn't much of foundation-l issue - we have been
collecting and providing detailed article viewership statistics for
over a year.
People are building various applications on top of that data, like
I am definitely not opposed to adding in that functionality as I have
mentioned in the past:
see thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/wikitec...@lists.wikimedia.org/msg00888.html
You should take a look at the work Mike Baynton did back in summer of
code 07.
The issue that we have is both the
I presume the WMF has a large amount of free disk space. How much?
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Michael Dale md...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I am definitely not opposed to adding in that functionality as I have
mentioned in the past:
see thread:
I don't think that's all that's needed. There will be Wikimedians scouring
the Internet for all free video in all of its forms (of which there is quite
a lot) and uploading it to Commons. You'll need an entire encoding farm.
Hard drives are cheap, its true, but redundant storage is less cheap as a
2009/6/8 Brian brian.min...@colorado.edu:
I don't think that's all that's needed. There will be Wikimedians scouring
the Internet for all free video in all of its forms (of which there is quite
a lot) and uploading it to Commons. You'll need an entire encoding farm.
Hard drives are cheap, its
We have done a good amount of work with archive.org to ensure that their
archive is interpretable. I know from the present vantage point it does
not seem helpful to have media on archive.org... but as features like
the add_media_wizard get deployed it will make a lot more sense why it
does not
Firefogg is not a very usable solution for most users. It requires far too
much sophistication. Users should be able to just upload video that they
know is under a free license and then everything else happens on the
backend.
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Michael Dale md...@wikimedia.org wrote:
2009/6/8 Brian brian.min...@colorado.edu:
I presume the WMF has a large amount of free disk space. How much?
Hard drives are cheap, the WMF can just buy more if that is all that is needed.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
hmm.. it will be a one-two click install directly from the upload page.
(if the user is using Firefox). Then it works exactly the same as the
existing upload interface only it transcodes the video as it uploads
Yea it would be good to support both; and yes we should simplify upload
This may be of interest to some Wikimedia contributors. The Digital
Open is a competition for youth (under 17) around the world to create
innovative free open technology projects. There's an associated
online contest that is running this summer (I'm a judge :)). The call
below is for stewards to
Wouldn't it be nicely ironic if the Internet decided to block China? I
wonder how it would play, when the Chinese government offices used to
unrestricted access suddenly found themselves surfing the Chinese Intranet
behind the Great Firewall blocking Chinese traffic from the rest of the
world...
Tim Starling wrote:
Some people in the community take the view that supporting proprietary
standards, as an option alongside free standards, weakens the ability
of the free standards to compete for mindshare and client support, and
thus that it shouldn't be done. We would have to have that
I hold the same sort of pragmatic view. In the absence of freely licensed
content encoded in a free format we should accept free content in any
format. I think it would take a revolution within the Foundation staff and
the most vocal parts of the community (note that I did not say majority),
25 matches
Mail list logo
