2009/9/5 Gregory Kohs thekoh...@gmail.com:
So, not having known that 3,000 square feet was the sum total of the
current WMF space on Stillman, my original but unpublished hunch was
correct.
Given how spectacularly incorrect your published accusations were
that's a pretty pathetic defense. Are
2009/9/5 Gregory Kohs thekoh...@gmail.com:
Geni wrote:
++
Given how spectacularly incorrect your published accusations were
that's a pretty pathetic defense. Are you going to apologise?
--
geni
++
I reported that the Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to sub-let space that
2009/9/5 Gregory Kohs thekoh...@gmail.com:
I reported that the Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to sub-let space that it
itself is renting. I have an e-mail from the property management firm
confirming the Wikimedia sublease. Erik Moeller has confirmed that the
Foundation is seeking to
Geni wrote:
++
Given how spectacularly incorrect your published accusations were
that's a pretty pathetic defense. Are you going to apologise?
--
geni
++
I reported that the Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to sub-let space that it
itself is renting. I have an e-mail from the
Gregory Kohs wrote:
Consider me a Leslie Stahl, circa 1972.
We should stop feeding the troll, especially this particular species of
novice self-made spy.
Yann
--
http://www.non-violence.org/ | Site collaboratif sur la non-violence
http://www.forget-me.net/ | Alternatives sur le Net
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/9/5 Gregory Kohs thekoh...@gmail.com:
Which accusations do you speak of?
That's curious, considering they had outgrown space in January 2009,
such
that they needed to shuttle Ruth and Frank Stanton's money
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 9:50 AM, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
WMF is swimming in surplus floor space?
Well, yeah, that's been confirmed actually. They have 11000 sq ft, plus
3000 sq ft, plus whatever they have at Wikia, and they only need the 11000
sq ft. Maybe they haven't moved in on the
please!
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Gregory Kohsthekoh...@gmail.com wrote:
When the Watergate story broke, it was felt to be a largely contained
story. Leslie Stahl once commented, **CBS sent me. It was a measure of how
unimportant CBS thought the story was in the beginning. As more
information
2009/9/5 Anthony wikim...@inbox.org:
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/9/5 Gregory Kohs thekoh...@gmail.com:
Which accusations do you speak of?
That's curious, considering they had outgrown space in January 2009,
such
that they needed to
Okie dokie.
2009/9/5 Lodewijk lodew...@effeietsanders.org
please!
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
Its a serious charge that is difficult to prove. The publicly released
financial statements are too general in nature to be useful. The only way to
prove/disprove this allegation and head off others is for the Foundation to
become more transparent. It is natural for people to come to
The best way to end this in the future is to give the community a brief heads
up along the line of Hey y'all, we will be moving to NEW ADDRESS effective
DATE This lets us know beforehand that the business address is going to
change, and allows the Foundation to leverage moving support from SF
2009/9/5 Geoffrey Plourde geo.p...@yahoo.com:
Its a serious charge that is difficult to prove. The publicly released
financial statements are too general in nature to be useful. The only way to
prove/disprove this allegation and head off others is for the Foundation to
become more
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Geoffrey Plourdegeo.p...@yahoo.com wrote:
The plan may have been mentioned ages ago, but a press release about the move
would have eliminated the opportunity for trolling.
They haven't moved yet. I bet we can safely let this topic drop, though.
Nathan
2009/9/6 Geoffrey Plourde geo.p...@yahoo.com:
The plan may have been mentioned ages ago, but a press release about the move
would have eliminated the opportunity for trolling.
Why would the press be interested in the WMF putting the offices they
are about to move out of on the market? The move
2009/9/6 Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com:
2009/9/6 Geoffrey Plourde geo.p...@yahoo.com:
The plan may have been mentioned ages ago, but a press release about the
move would have eliminated the opportunity for trolling.
Why would the press be interested in the WMF putting the offices
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote:
A plan to move isn't worthy of a press release -
it would only cover a single sentence (The WMF has more staff than it
has room for desks, so it is planning to move to new, larger
offices.).
Is that all they have, a
2009/9/6 Anthony wikim...@inbox.org:
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote:
A plan to move isn't worthy of a press release -
it would only cover a single sentence (The WMF has more staff than it
has room for desks, so it is planning to move to new, larger
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/9/6 Anthony wikim...@inbox.org:
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com
wrote:
A plan to move isn't worthy of a press release -
it would only cover a single sentence (The WMF
Correct, I meant announcement not press release. Announcing this move by
placing a blurb on the foundation site, asking for assistance on the sf list,
and letting the signpost know all would have headed this discussion off
From: geni geni...@gmail.com
To:
21 matches
Mail list logo
