This is very awesome. I am in the early stages of trying to scope out a
small side project to do a mediawiki <-> git bridge; it is very
challenging. Being able to download the complete edit history in this
fashion is extremely useful. Thank you very much for sharing this work.
-Josh
On Fri, Oct
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>>> Then why are you using git?
It turns out there are a few wikis built on top of git :
1. the git-wiki :
http://atonie.org/2008/02/git-wiki
http://github.com/jeffbski/git-wiki
git-wiki is a wiki that relies on git to keep pages' histo
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 6:40 AM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:38 PM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
>> wrote:
>>> There are ways to optimize all of this. Most users will not want to
>>> download the
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:38 PM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
> wrote:
>> There are ways to optimize all of this. Most users will not want to
>> download the full history.
>
> Then why are you using git?
I am not most users. I am using
I have submitted the following to GNU.org
It doesn't make sense to send something like this to a gnu.org mailing list.
The GNU project does not accept copyrights in any official capacity--that
work is done by the FSF. And, it's really only worth emailing them if people
actually assigned copyright
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:38 PM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
wrote:
> There are ways to optimize all of this. Most users will not want to
> download the full history.
Then why are you using git?
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikim
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> It is cool that you get the complete history.
>
> But— it's a bit uncool that its about 14mbytes when the article is
> 100k; understandable given that the expanded uncompressed history is
> about 337mbytes...
I have the uncompressed histo
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 2:55 PM, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
wrote:
> Hallo,
> I have gotten the wikipedia article for Kosovo in git.
> It is fast, distributed, highly compressed, redundant, branchable and usable.
>
> The blame function will show you who edited what version.
>
> Here Blame on t
Hallo,
I have gotten the wikipedia article for Kosovo in git.
It is fast, distributed, highly compressed, redundant, branchable and usable.
The blame function will show you who edited what version.
Here Blame on the up to date kosovo article!
http://github.com/h4ck3rm1k3/KosovoWikipedia/blame/mas
