On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/2 Magnus Manske magnusman...@googlemail.com:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net wrote:
Olli wrote:
Date: 2009/10/31
Subject: Wikipedia christmas calendar?
What about a
2009/11/2 Magnus Manske magnusman...@googlemail.com:
I think a human selected calendar would be better for actually
publishing, but that's certainly a fun script. Can you add an option
to choose a category so we can have a calendar of Britons, or French,
or mathematicians, or military people,
2009/11/2 Magnus Manske magnusman...@googlemail.com:
One bug: I got a graph of Imran Khan's bowling statistics rather than
his portrait...
And if you give me code to identify a person's image, I'll be happy to
implement it, as would the NSA. As it stands, I chose a random article
from e.g.
suggestions:
1 =You should add option to select what country (what wikipedia (fi, en,
sv...))
2 = Calendr should be like right calendar
3 = Other languages (translation possiblity)
Olli
2009/11/2 Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
2009/11/2 Magnus Manske magnusman...@googlemail.com:
In a message dated 11/2/2009 8:31:15 AM Pacific Standard Time,
effeietsand...@gmail.com writes:
Why can't people learn when a discussion is irritating other people, why
can't people learn which discussions are most useful to have, why can't
people learn that they might frustrate the very
2009/11/2 wjhon...@aol.com:
In a message dated 11/2/2009 8:31:15 AM Pacific Standard Time,
effeietsand...@gmail.com writes:
Why can't people learn when a discussion is irritating other people, why
can't people learn which discussions are most useful to have, why can't
people learn that
In a message dated 11/2/2009 10:59:23 AM Pacific Standard Time,
thomas.dal...@gmail.com writes:
Why can't people use email clients that don't break threads? ;)
AOL = Satan
They are out to destroy all life and light.
Will
___
foundation-l mailing
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Dan Collins dcoll...@stevens.edu wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yes, you can delete the archives on the WMF site. That does make much
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Anthony wikim...@inbox.org wrote:
I fail to see how this is contrary to the mission of the Wikimedia
Foundation to empower and engage people around the world to collect
and develop educational content under a free license or in the public
domain, and to
wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 11/2/2009 10:59:23 AM Pacific Standard Time,
thomas.dal...@gmail.com writes:
Why can't people use email clients that don't break threads? ;)
AOL = Satan
They are out to destroy all life and light.
Last time I checked, you could use any
Personally, I process about two or three hundred emails per day (yes per day),
so the small amount of noise the Foundation list creates is negligible to me.
If someone is so annoyed by a thread, that they can't even bother to DWR
(delete without reading) based merely on the subject title, I
That's a bit of an extreme remark Tim. There are millions of computer
programmers in the world, who do not know or care to try to learn how to
operate AOL. Not every programmers is a Windows programmer. Myopic view of
understanding computers. I could just as well opine, that people who
Hoi,
It is not about you.. it is about US ... and some of us are not like you, do
not agree with you and have a different outlook on this... Please get it
that most people do not have the time to waste on so many e-mails.
There is also the fact that most threads including this one do not stay on
And I never said it is about *me* stop trying to make this personal.
I am not directing my remarks at *you*, so stop directing yours at *me*.
There are many people on this very list who have said essentially the exact
same thing.
You should re-read the thread again to make that apparent, if
Magnus Manske wrote:
One bug: I got a graph of Imran Khan's bowling statistics rather than
his portrait...
And if you give me code to identify a person's image, I'll be happy to
implement it, as would the NSA. As it stands, I chose a random article
Google image search has it, so it's not
15 matches
Mail list logo
