On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 01:00, private musings thepmacco...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm more raising the issue that what could be child pornography remains
available to wmf volunteers with 'oversight' op.s on commons - I don't think
HHOKyou wanna get the only fun from poor oversights, naughty
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 3:19 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
As for the link, showing these in greatly enlarged versions, without
the context of the articles in which they are used, is setting up a
strong bias. We've never engaged in that use of the material, nor
would we. If
Дана Monday 18 January 2010 16:33:00 Bod Notbod написа:
somewhat taken aback by a few of the pics in that video... are we ever
going to have an article called gay facial?
Are you saying that you will be surprised if you find out that we have one?
___
On Jan 18, 2010, at 10:25 AM, Nikola Smolenski wrote:
Are you saying that you will be surprised if you find out that we
have one?
I'm mostly surprised that we DON'T.
Philippe Beaudette
Facilitator, Strategy Project
Wikimedia Foundation
phili...@wikimedia.org
There are 3 phenomena acting simultaneously against the number of visits to
small projects: The bilingual effect, the size effect, and the Google
effect. For Catalan case we estimate a penalization factor of 8.3 (that
means that visits are 8.3 times less that what they should be). It comes
from:
Joan Goma hett schreven:
There are 3 phenomena acting simultaneously against the number of visits to
small projects: The bilingual effect, the size effect, and the Google
effect. For Catalan case we estimate a penalization factor of 8.3 (that
means that visits are 8.3 times less that what they
Dear all,
We've had SUL ([1]) for almost two years now. At the moment projects all
have different policies for usurpation. On some projects conflicts can
easily be solved, while on others they can't.
Are there any plans for having a Foundation wide policy on that? Will
unattached accounts ever
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Nikola Smolenski smole...@eunet.rs wrote:
somewhat taken aback by a few of the pics in that video... are we ever
going to have an article called gay facial?
Are you saying that you will be surprised if you find out that we have one?
Heh, after I pressed
On 01/18/2010 09:29 AM, Joan Goma wrote:
There are 3 phenomena acting simultaneously against the number of visits to
small projects: The bilingual effect, the size effect, and the Google
effect. For Catalan case we estimate a penalization factor of 8.3 (that
means that visits are 8.3 times
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 2:23 AM, K. Peachey p858sn...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:39 AM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
iirc, there is already a mediawiki capability for images to be
completely removed from the servers.
I can't see this capability in the sysop
It's possible for system administrators to delete files entirely from
the servers for legal reasons, but because it is quite
labour-intensive, I for one have only ever performed such a deletion
when it is real child pornography (hint: a 16-year-old masturbating is
not real child pornography,
Nathan writes:
With respect, legal issues are debated on many projects practically
every day. This particular issue is no different. In some
jurisdictions, just accessing such files can expose one to legal risk.
While Mike is a good lawyer, he doesn't represent individual editors -
and the
2010/1/19 Mike Godwin mnemo...@gmail.com:
Keep in mind, though, that PM is constantly asking for Foundation
intervention with regard to the images that he is so consistently reviewing
and concerned about. Why PM wants Foundation intervention rather than
community consensus is unclear to me --
( ah c'mon d - who loves ya' baby ;-)
It's good to see you (Mike) here too - I'm glad you're clearly aware of the
concerns I've consistently raised, and I appreciate that I may not have been
completely clear about what I would hope the foundation, as oppose to the
communities, might be able to do
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 5:41 PM, private musings thepmacco...@gmail.comwrote:
Finally, your last bit, Mike, seemed to indicate that you feel the DOJ
(department of justice, I think) would be wanting to talk to you if anything
bad was going on does that really prohibit us from chatting
heh! indeed - I don't think anyone would expect you to disclose everything
on this list! That would be rather silly ;-)
I'm also certain of both your expertise and connections in regard to law
enforcement, DOJs and whatnot - I certainly haven't meant to imply that your
expertise in this regard is
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 8:31 PM, private musings thepmacco...@gmail.comwrote:
I just had a good chat with someone pointing out that my posts probably
conflate a few different areas, so perhaps while I may have your ear, Mike,
I could ask you if you'd see any problem with expanding the role of
2010/1/17 private musings thepmacco...@gmail.com:
Here's another concerning aspect of management of explicit media on WMF;
It's been asserted that images of a 16 year old girl masturbating have been
uploaded to commons;
Whats that got to do with management? Any service that allows user
uploads
**
____ _ __ _
/ / /\ \ (_) | _(_)___(_)_ __ ___
\ \/ \/ / | |/ / |_ / | '_ \ / _ \
\ /\ /| | | |/ /| | | | | __/
\/ \/ |_|_|\_\_/___|_|_| |_|\___|
.org
Anno Domini MMX Week III
Mike Godwin wrote:
Nathan writes:
With respect, legal issues are debated on many projects practically
every day. This particular issue is no different. In some
jurisdictions, just accessing such files can expose one to legal risk.
While Mike is a good lawyer, he doesn't represent
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Andrew Garrett agarr...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
(hint: a 16-year-old masturbating is
not real child pornography, and is in fact legal, though explicit,
in New South Wales, Australia).
Last I checked the WMF falls under US law, so you might want to read
Details on how to measure it are relatively complex. We can make a guess
because of data collected from sources available for Catalan. My mail was
just to explain the phenomena.
Figures results from: a) Surveys. Last one answered by 400 Catalan Wikipedia
readers. We use results from answer to
22 matches
Mail list logo
