Hoi,
After a long time of development, the software that brings much improved
usability is scheduled to go live around the end of April, the beginning of
May. This will mark a big change in the MediaWiki software. I expect that as
a consequence the composition of the most used messages will
There is a bugzilla ticket[1] being discussed during last three years having no
result and minimal attraction from Wikimedia. On March 27, 2007 be.wiki was
moved to be-x-old.wiki in a hurry, and there were no ideas why 'be-x-old' while
the subtag 'be-tarask' proposed and applied by IANA had
I think there are two options: Meta and pt.wp itself. My personal opinion is
that it does not need to be bilingual, but that is of course up to you.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Virgilio A. P. Machado v...@fct.unl.ptwrote:
Thanks Chad. I know that, but what kind of page (what title)? Where?
Hoi,
To poor some cold water on this discussion. The language policy is quite
clear. There is no room for two Portuguese Wikipedias. When you are able to
convince the ISO 639-3 standard to make Portuguese a macro language it will
become different.
There have been languages that made that claim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The call for applications for Wikimania Scholarships to attend
Wikimania 2010 https://wm10schols.wikimedia.org/in Gdansk, Poland
(July 9-11) is now open. The Wikimedia Foundation offers Scholarships
to pay for selected individuals' round trip travel,
Mark,
A page in the Portuguese Wikipedia could shut out
the community at large. A bilingual page would be
very hard to pull off. As far as I can tell,
non-Portuguese discussions are not welcomed there.
I looked at Meta and saw no place for a page like
that. Could you be more specific?
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Virgilio A. P. Machado v...@fct.unl.pt wrote:
Mark,
A page in the Portuguese Wikipedia could shut out
the community at large. A bilingual page would be
very hard to pull off. As far as I can tell,
non-Portuguese discussions are not welcomed there.
I looked
Point of clarification... does Jimmy Wales have the authority to
impose a global ban on a user?
http://en.wikiversity.org/w/index.php?title=Wikiversity:Community_Review/Wikimedia_Ethics:Ethical_Breaching_Experimentscurid=92825diff=548143oldid=548142
Sincerely,
Gregory Kohs
I feel it relevant to this thread to point out a new page created by the
thread's original poster and closely related to the previous link provided:
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Founder/Proposal_to_the_rights_removal
Sincerely,
Adrignola
Admin/Bureaucrat/CU @ en.wikibooks
On Sun, Mar 21,
Began!
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Portuguese_language_issues
If you have any further suggestions or comments, they are very welcome.
Please use either the
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Portuguese_language_issues#EnglishEnglish
or
sometimes things with broad community support don't really bear examination
;-)
http://hungrybeast.abc.net.au/stories/internet-filter-survey-results
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
Gregory Kohs wrote:
Point of clarification... does Jimmy Wales have
11 matches
Mail list logo
