I usually give no reply to trolls, so it's just for your information
as other subscribers on good faith.
It's too bad English to understand what it means, so I just give you
details instead.
I don't know when wikipedia.jp was first acquired exactly but the
first acquisition might be in 2003, when
The "wikipedia.jp" domain acquisition was requested from User:Aphaia
by the Wikimedia Foundation staff. The individual User:Tietew was
owned. On earth, who requested it?
山吹色の御菓子
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
This is spammy and OT -- but still may be of interest to people on
this list. I can vouch for the awesomeness of the localwiki project,
which is trying to make local and city wikis (like the amazing Davis
Wiki, which serves my hometown) for the world. Free, local, open and
nonprofit -- and they're
On 7 September 2010 11:01, Teofilo wrote:
> No and there won't be (at least from me). Because I don't know if it
> is a bug or a feature. Show me the specification of the pdf tool
> first. I will see if the specification says that pictures'
> photographers should be credited. If the specification
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Teofilo wrote:
> 2010/9/7, Tim Starling :
>
>> Presumably this conspiracy would have to extend beyond the WMF to
>> PediaPress and Purodha Blissenbach, the developers of Collection and
>> mobile.wikipedia.org respectively.
>
> The absence of a history tab in the mob
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Teofilo wrote:
> (1) [His] theory seeks to show that social agents develop strategies
> which are adapted to the needs of the social worlds that they inhabit.
Strikes me that having a strategy that is adapted to your world is
probably quite useful. For example, Wi
Hello,
In an annual effort to welcome new Board members with an informal
chat, the newest Wikimedia Trustees (Phoebe and Bishakha) are taking
part in an open meeting on IRC this Saturday. This is a forum to
discuss Wikimedia issues and anything else that's on your mind.
Where : #wikimedia on
On 7 September 2010 13:03, Teofilo wrote:
> Let's not call this a conspiracy.
You already did:
"I think it is partly thoughtlessness, partly an agenda to remove
contributor's names from wherever is possible, so that the WMF can
dominate the contents and do whatever it wants with them without t
2010/9/7, Tim Starling :
> Presumably this conspiracy would have to extend beyond the WMF to
> PediaPress and Purodha Blissenbach, the developers of Collection and
> mobile.wikipedia.org respectively.
The absence of a history tab in the mobile format is in my view an
exact measurement of the temp
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:25 AM, Teofilo wrote:
> 2010/9/7, Kropotkine_113 :
>> There is absolutely nothing wrong with it on french Wikipedia.
>
> My interpretation : French admins are happy to see their powers
> increased, and to mimic oversighters with it.
You don't seem to understand how the fe
2010/9/7, Kropotkine_113 :
> There is absolutely nothing wrong with it on french Wikipedia.
My interpretation : French admins are happy to see their powers
increased, and to mimic oversighters with it. Non-admins, especially
newly-registered ones might be too shy or not aware that they are
allowed
On 07/09/10 20:01, Teofilo wrote:
> 2010/9/7, Tim Starling :
>>
>> If you don't like it, you can request that it be switched off, using
>> Bugzilla. You will need to demonstrate that the community is in favour
>> of such an action.
>
> This is not proactive. Giving more power to the admins is a
>
2010/9/7 K. Peachey
>
> RevDel replaced Oversight (a extension), and little changed overall
> between then, it features two deletion levels, one that hides it from
> standard users (admins and higher still have access to it) and one
> that hides it from everyone except oversight which leaves no vi
Le mardi 07 septembre 2010 à 20:18 +1000, K. Peachey a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Teofilo wrote:
> Is there something wrong with this on the french wikipedia? then you
> should submit a bug request so people actually know and can work on
> getting it set correctly
There is absolut
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Teofilo wrote:
> This is not proactive. Giving more power to the admins is a
> constitutional change. Usually a constitutional change requires a
> referendum beforehand (An amendment to the United States Constitution
> must be ratified by 3/4 of the state legislatur
2010/9/7, Tim Starling :
>
> If you don't like it, you can request that it be switched off, using
> Bugzilla. You will need to demonstrate that the community is in favour
> of such an action.
This is not proactive. Giving more power to the admins is a
constitutional change. Usually a constitutiona
16 matches
Mail list logo
