*Dzień dobry, *Przykuta
One of Wikipedia perennial dilemmas is quantity vs. quality. Low depth and
low articles to non-auricles ratio usually a sign that too many articles
were created semiautomatically, by bots and the community is spread too thin
e.g. there is not enough people to correct and
Despite repeated assurances at Wikimania, on lists and on strategywiki,
that the strategic plan was going to consider all Wikimedia projects as
important, now at
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Five-year_targets the
second target, «Increase the amount of information we offer»
2010/10/10 Виктория mstisla...@gmail.com:
*Dzień dobry, *Przykuta
One of Wikipedia perennial dilemmas is quantity vs. quality. Low depth and
low articles to non-auricles ratio usually a sign that too many articles
were created semiautomatically, by bots and the community is spread too thin
So perhaps it's something about the way the Polish Wikipedia works? A
few thoughts:
* Polish doesn't host any images - unlike most other projects - so
there's no need for image pages, image talkpages, etc. On some
projects, such as German, as many as 6% of pages are in the image
I agree that Peter's post exaggerates the problem the English
Wikipedia sometimes has with groupthink and an entrenched,
self-perpetuating bureaucracy. The comparison is unfair to Liu
Xiaobo's history and work.
Still, it's ironic that the first response to his somewhat
inflammatory remarks was to
On 10 Oct 2010, at 11:33, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote:
Despite repeated assurances at Wikimania, on lists and on strategywiki,
that the strategic plan was going to consider all Wikimedia projects as
important, now at
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Five-year_targets the
on 10/10/10 1:44 PM, Nathan at nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree that Peter's post exaggerates the problem the English
Wikipedia sometimes has with groupthink and an entrenched,
self-perpetuating bureaucracy. The comparison is unfair to Liu
Xiaobo's history and work.
Still, it's ironic that
Old talk pages with solved problems are deleted.
This is extremely strange. Talk pages are part of the article history.
Ortega's thesis should be updated, perhaps.
«The combination of a very active cohort of bots, together
with the very low ratio of talk pages, indicates that the Polish
On 06.10.2010 02:22, M. Williamson wrote:
Marcus Buck wrote:
Read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moldovan_schools_in_Transnistria.
They want to switch to Latin since long but the government does
everything to stop them.
Marcus, that is a tiny minority of Moldovans in Transnistria, and that
My apologies for the Godwinism. I am a writer, the idea of preventing
someone expressing a viewpoint is reprehensible. Disruption to the project
of building a comprehensive and reliable reference source is one thing.
That is a matter of a 'preventative block'. Punitive blocks intended to
Czesc all,
On 10 Oct 2010, at 06:54, Przykuta wrote:
Hi
In pl wiki depth is very weak. We have many edits, like other bigger
Wikipedias, but Ratio is problematical (Non-Articles/Articles). We have not a
lot of non-article pages. Could you help us? Any ideas?
Hi Peter,
On 9 Oct 2010, at 11:15, Peter Damian wrote:
My apologies for the Godwinism. I am a writer, the idea of preventing
someone expressing a viewpoint is reprehensible. Disruption to the project
of building a comprehensive and reliable reference source is one thing.
That is a
- Original Message -
From: Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Free speech
if an irrational argument is preventing you from sharing logical
arguments,
2010/10/10 Zugravu Gheorghe zugravu.gheor...@gmail.com:
On 06.10.2010 02:22, M. Williamson wrote:
Marcus Buck wrote:
Read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moldovan_schools_in_Transnistria.
They want to switch to Latin since long but the government does
everything to stop them.
Marcus, that
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree that Peter's post exaggerates the problem the English
Wikipedia sometimes has with groupthink and an entrenched,
self-perpetuating bureaucracy. The comparison is unfair to Liu
Xiaobo's history and work.
Still, it's
Does pl.wp have WikiProjects? If not, then perhaps this could explain the
reduced number of non-article edits, given how many pages on en.wp only have
wikiproject templates on their talk pages (or cases where having a
non-redlink has promoted discussions).
Thanks,
Mike Peel
Sure,
An'n 10.10.2010 22:50, hett M. Williamson schreven:
Yes, and I would like to remind you that until relatively recently,
all varieties of Romanian/Moldovan were always written in Cyrillic.
Anti-Cyrillic position is to state that Moldovan Cyrillic is an
artificial, Russian-based orthography,
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo)
nemow...@gmail.com wrote:
Despite repeated assurances at Wikimania, on lists and on strategywiki,
that the strategic plan was going to consider all Wikimedia projects as
important, now at
I am not sure that deleting disccusion pages as a default is a good thing.
If the discussion page exists some people will check it out of curosity and
stay on the site longer, may be add their comments. Red scares many users,
they don't know how to create a new page. Of course I don't like this
19 matches
Mail list logo
