This may be related to the deployment of the new CentralNotice banner
loader. An RT ticket has been opened to investigate. If so, we may need
to filter those requests from the page view stats.
Ryan Kaldari
On 10/18/10 6:16 PM, Erik Zachte wrote:
For those of you who want to follow this
This isn't why Peter was moderated, is it?
Frank
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.netwrote:
Peter Damian, it turns out has a blog, Beyond Necessity and has
commented on our banning and moderating activities:
I would like to raise your attention on a topic related to movement roles.
It seems that activities of movement roles working group has not raised high
interest at meta probably because it is a one year term job.
One week ago I wrote a list of comments and proposals at talk page:
AFAIK, president of Wikimedia Russia is Vladimir Medeyko, not
Stanislav Kozlovskiy. And wikipedia.ru seems to be squatted.
I have to admit that cyber-squatters have become more inventive. They
are making NPOs for squatting domains of other NPOs.
Stanislav Kozlovskiy is a vice-president
This time from Microsoft Research:
http://blog.wikimedia.org/blog/2010/10/18/wikibhasha/
Has anyone used this one? How is it?
Did Google ever commit to releasing the translation pairs? If so, we
should certainly ask Microsoft for the same.
- d.
___
Stanislav Kozlovskiy is a vice-president of Wikimedia Russia.
It is still not clear whether this is hoax or somebody really filed a
lawsuit.
Cheers
Yaroslav
As I understand it he didn't file the lawsuit, he just complained to the
police. The police was obliged to tick the box contacting
2010/10/19 Виктория mstisla...@gmail.com:
Stanislav Kozlovskiy is a vice-president of Wikimedia Russia.
It is still not clear whether this is hoax or somebody really filed a
lawsuit.
Cheers
Yaroslav
As I understand it he didn't file the lawsuit, he just complained to the
police. The
John Vandenberg, 19/10/2010 12:43:
And there is still a lot of discussion on the Russian Wikisource village pump.
http://ru.wikisource.org/wiki/Викитека:Форум
They have created a template to put on works that are on the Russian
Federal List of Extremist Materials.
On 10/19/2010 02:24 PM, Fred Bauder wrote:
At its meeting on 9 October, the Movement Roles working group
presented an update on its current work and an outline for the coming
year. Thanks to everybody who participated in the preparation of the
proposal. The Board approved the direction of the group, and
encouraged all interested parties,
Hello David,
See my experiences in
http://zikoblog.wordpress.com/
I do not recall exactly how the GoogleTK worked, but it is more or
less the same.
Kind regards
Ziko
2010/10/18 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
This time from Microsoft Research:
This time from Microsoft Research:
http://blog.wikimedia.org/blog/2010/10/18/wikibhasha/
Has anyone used this one? How is it?
Did Google ever commit to releasing the translation pairs? If so, we
should certainly ask Microsoft for the same.
- d.
I'm trying to make it work as a gadget.
This isn't why Peter was moderated, is it?
Frank
The folks who control the list:
foundation-l list run by adhair at gmail.com, wiki.ral315 at gmail.com,
alexandrdmitriromanov at gmail.com
didn't say much. Kohs has a big anti campaign in progress, but all I can
find about Peter Damain is bad
On reflection, I guess I (I, not the Foundation), envision our public
mailing lists as being for all who are involved and interested, casually
or intensely, as well as for observers are simply monitoring our on-going
discussions, and who may, from time to time, wish to comment or initiate
topics.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I don't think we're in danger of outlawing sharp criticism on
Foundation-l. If I had to give a guesstimate of the content breakdown of
Foundation-l traffic, it would look something like:
10% news/events/media coverage
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
If it pleases the moderators, might we know on what basis Greg was
banned and Peter indefinitely muzzled?
Greg Kohs was banned for the same reason that he's been on moderation
for the better part of the past year—namely, that he
Just a test. It seems I have been put on moderation simply for making the
earlier posts about plagiarism on Wikipedia. Free culture!
- Original Message -
From: foundation-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
To: peter.dam...@btinternet.com
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 10:17 PM
Subject:
I don't think we gain anything by providing a platform for Kohs campaign,
as illustrated at
http://www.mywikibiz.com/Top_10_Reasons_Not_to_Donate_to_Wikipedia
against Wikipedia.
Wow, this is very well written and interesting! please share more such
information.
On 19 Oct 2010, at 18:44, Mike Dupont wrote:
I don't think we gain anything by providing a platform for Kohs campaign,
as illustrated at
http://www.mywikibiz.com/Top_10_Reasons_Not_to_Donate_to_Wikipedia
against Wikipedia.
Wow, this is very well written and interesting! please share more
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
On 19 Oct 2010, at 18:44, Mike Dupont wrote:
I don't think we gain anything by providing a platform for Kohs campaign,
as illustrated at
http://www.mywikibiz.com/Top_10_Reasons_Not_to_Donate_to_Wikipedia
against
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.netwrote:
It could be added as a Mediawiki extension. Not sure if anyone is
thinking about that.
Fred
The blog post from Danese talks about it launchign a Mediawiki extension
project, I'm not sure what the time table is on
2010/10/19 James Alexander jameso...@gmail.com:
The blog post from Danese talks about it launchign a Mediawiki extension
project, I'm not sure what the time table is on that however.
They've committed code for an extension:
http://svn.wikimedia.org/viewvc/mediawiki/trunk/extensions/WikiBhasha/
Hoi,
It is always sad to learn that someone who is appreciated as much as Mike
is, is leaving. I hope he will be happy in his future activities.
I want to thank Mike for the work that he has done. My contacts with Mike
have always been positive so I feel it as a loss.
Thanks,
Gerard
On 19
On 19 Oct 2010, at 19:06, Mike Dupont wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net wrote:
On 19 Oct 2010, at 18:44, Mike Dupont wrote:
I don't think we gain anything by providing a platform for Kohs campaign,
as illustrated at
That page is so full of misinformation, it hardly warrants commentary,
but just to point out some more annoying examples:
The part about how Your non-profit donation will ultimately line the
for-profit pockets of Jimmy Wales, Amazon, Google is absurd and very
misleading. Sure, Wikipedia
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote:
And that's just one of many sections erroneously blaming the WMF for
content issues. For example, A WikiProject of topic lists has existed
since November 2007, but it is still half unfinished and the 100
articles about
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
And that's just one of many sections erroneously blaming the WMF for
content issues. For example, A WikiProject of topic lists has existed
since November 2007, but it is still half unfinished and the 100
articles
From: Austin Hair adh...@gmail.com
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Tue, October 19, 2010 12:35:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Greg Kohs and Peter Damian
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Nathan nawr...@gmail.com
A longer piece about this:
http://www.mn.ru/society/20101019/188137566.html
--
John Vandenberg
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
A longer piece about this:
http://www.mn.ru/society/20101019/188137566.html
--
John Vandenberg
And it contains the conflation of Wikipedia with WikiLeaks, to boot.
Fred
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe
Brigitte,
I agree with you. You raised some very good points.
Sincerely,
Virgilio A. P. Machado
At 03:47 20-10-2010, you wrote:
From: Austin
Hair adh...@gmail.com To: Wikimedia Foundation
Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Tue, October 19,
In the five or so years that i spent on Wikipedia it never bothered me
and i never heard complaints about it until today, but come to think
of it, there is something odd in the way users are notified about new
messages on their user talk pages.
The famous orange message in English says: You have
33 matches
Mail list logo
