The main page of the Usability wiki ( http://usability.wikimedia.org ) says
that it's discontinued and the whole wiki appears to be locked for editing.
I don't remember this being discussed, although i may have missed it.
I understand that after completing the Vector rollout and the using up of
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Amir E. Aharoni
amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il wrote:
The main page of the Usability wiki ( http://usability.wikimedia.org ) says
that it's discontinued and the whole wiki appears to be locked for editing.
I don't remember this being discussed, although i may have
On 29 January 2011 06:00, Nikola Smolenski smole...@eunet.rs wrote:
Дана Saturday 29 January 2011 01:39:26 David Goodman написа:
A wonderful precedent for other approaches to press agencies--it will
perhaps work best for those agencies that have an appropriate
special concern for the area
On 29 January 2011 11:41, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
This seems like a good place to mention that the precedent was set by the
Beta
news agency ( http://www.beta.rs/ ) which gave permission for its news to be
uploaded to Wikinews as CC-BY.
I was completely unaware of this!
I
I think it would be more productive to import the usability content into
Meta, close down the usability wiki if it's served it's intended purpose,
and continue the discussion at meta.
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 6:35 AM, K. Peachey p858sn...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Amir
Greetings,
Le samedi 29 janvier 2011 à 21:35 +1000, K. Peachey a écrit :
I must disagree with that, fragmenting discussions all over the place
just makes things worse, It would be much better to keep these
discussions centralized on somewhere like Meta or Mediawiki wiki (or
possibly
I would hope that in the future, the decision to make a separate wiki for
any subproject is not taken as lightly, given the concerns about
fragmenting discussions - it's much easier to track these things when they
are all in one place. :)
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Guillaume Paumier
Hoi,
The Argentian chapter has a lot of news footage from the Argentian National
Broadcaster. Beatriz told us at the GLAM conference in Paris that the
chapter is talking to other broadcasters for their material as well.
At the conference Multichil discussed with her the need for a tool to manage
Dear Mido,
the Wikimedia movement is like a big family. Even though we sometimes
quarry with each other but especially in time like this we are all with
you. In the last days I often think back of the hospitality from all of
you to so many Wikimedians from all around the world back in
Dear Ting,
I would like to thank you very much for these kind words and support.
Mido
On 29 January 2011 17:34, Ting Chen wing.phil...@gmx.de wrote:
Dear Mido,
the Wikimedia movement is like a big family. Even though we sometimes
quarry with each other but especially in time like this we
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Guillaume Paumier
gpaum...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Le samedi 29 janvier 2011 à 21:35 +1000, K. Peachey a écrit :
I must disagree with that, fragmenting discussions all over the place
just makes things worse, It would be much better to keep these
discussions
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Keegan Peterzell keegan.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 2:33 PM, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it would do us a lot of good to be able to recombine all of
these topics so when we are looking for a calendar or a presentation
On 29 January 2011 16:20, phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Having many wikis is an ongoing source of irritation for many, and it
would be great to resolve this issue. Are there good arguments *for*
having separate sites? Or at least for not recombining them into meta
with a redirect
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 15:34, Ting Chen wing.phil...@gmx.de wrote:
the Wikimedia movement is like a big family. Even though we sometimes
quarry with each other but especially in time like this we are all with
you. In the last days I often think back of the hospitality from all of
you to so
Indeed, in 2008/2009 there was a little wave of new wikis by Wikimedia
Foundation. It seemed to me as if it was a prestige thing for the new
WMF collaborators to get a wiki of their own. :-) We have Meta Wiki
and similar general wikis already.
A similar tendency we saw in some of the larger
Ziko van Dijk, 29/01/2011 18:29:
A similar tendency we saw in some of the larger chapters.
What are you referring to?
Nemo
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 15:34, Ting Chen wing.phil...@gmx.de wrote:
the Wikimedia movement is like a big family. Even though we sometimes
quarry with each other but especially in time like this we are all with
you. In the last days I often think back of the hospitality from all of
you to so
2011/1/29 phoebe ayers phoebe.w...@gmail.com:
Having many wikis is an ongoing source of irritation for many, and it
would be great to resolve this issue. Are there good arguments *for*
having separate sites?
Yes, and I think most people generally underestimate the complexity of
the issue. The
Why can't people pay £2 per month and be a member of Wiki-everything!
Better than [pledging.
Have a on line active site that tells you what is going on how much money
there is! Get a members package?
What do you think?!
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 5:13 AM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:46 AM, koteche mcintosh
kotechemcint...@gmail.com wrote:
Why can't people pay £2 per month and be a member of Wiki-everything!
Better than [pledging.
Have a on line active site that tells you what is going on how much money
there is! Get a members package?
20 matches
Mail list logo
