I think we may want a historic texts wikisource/wikibooks particularly for
texts in now extinct languages. Something sort of like commons for historic
texts for all extinct languages. I do not know something like this was
proposed before.
-- とある白い猫 (To Aru Shiroi Neko)
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008
Holy ancient thread revival, Batman!
This seems like a good idea... but in the case of Wikisource, wouldn't that
already be covered by multilingual Wikisource?
2011/9/20 とある白い猫 to.aru.shiroi.n...@gmail.com
I think we may want a historic texts wikisource/wikibooks particularly
for
texts in
2011/9/21 M. Williamson node...@gmail.com:
Holy ancient thread revival, Batman!
This seems like a good idea... but in the case of Wikisource, wouldn't that
already be covered by multilingual Wikisource?
Yes, extinct/historical languages are collected by the multilingual
Wikisource project.
Hello,
(Sorry for cross-posting this.)
In just two days, Wikimedia Sverige is once again going to participate at
the Gothenburg Book Fair, which is the second largest book fair in Europe.
Around 100 000 people come there every year from almost all of our target
groups.
This year, we have
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com wrote:
Thoughts?
I am against anything that validates the image filter.
I still believe that the filter is against the mission of the foundation.
--
Fajro
___
foundation-l mailing
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 02:24:37PM +0200, Ziko van Dijk wrote:
Hello Fae,
There should be no explicit statement because the WMF holds it
self-evident to preserve.
That reminds me of something O:-)
Perhaps something like this?
We, the wikimedia movement, hold these truths to be self
Kim Bruning wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 02:24:37PM +0200, Ziko van Dijk wrote:
Hello Fae,
There should be no explicit statement because the WMF holds it
self-evident to preserve.
That reminds me of something O:-)
Perhaps something like this?
We, the wikimedia movement, hold these
On 09/13/11 6:11 AM, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote:
I am not a Wictionary contributor but I was never able to understand why
we have Wictionaries in different language, though a big part of those seem
to be translations on other languages, and they overlap. Would it not be
advantageous to have
Yes but isn't multilingual wikisource more of an incubator rather than
exclusively for historic texts? It would make more sense to separate the two
as inherently the two tasks have different goals in mind.
-- とある白い猫 (To Aru Shiroi Neko)
2011/9/20 John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com
2011/9/21
