On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Castelo michelcastelobra...@gmail.comwrote:
On 21-10-2011 03:06, Andreas K. wrote:
the
median is always smaller than the average.
There's no such relation between median and average:
{20, 21, 24, 26, 28}: Median (24) Average (23.8)
{20, 22, 24, 26, 28}:
On 21-10-2011 04:11, Andre Engels wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Castelomichelcastelobra...@gmail.comwrote:
On 21-10-2011 03:06, Andreas K. wrote:
the
median is always smaller than the average.
There's no such relation between median and average:
{20, 21, 24, 26, 28}: Median (24)
2011/10/18 WereSpielChequers werespielchequ...@gmail.com:
Hi Fae, I don't know about other projects, but on EN wki random article
means just that. There have been a number of proposals to skew things and
filter certain things out, but these have foundered on the twin concerns
that including
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 04:19, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
Somehow David Gerard, Milos Rancic, Kim and Tobias Oelgarte made it to
96, 95, 89 and 83 posts last month. Last month Thomas Dalton,
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen and I posted 39, 37 and 35 times respectively,
and everyone else
I wrote:
I believe that we should focus on the criteria behind reliable sources'
illustrative decisions, *not* the decisions themselves.
Andreas Kolbe replied:
Ah well, that *is* second-guessing the source, because unless the author
tells you, you have no way of knowing *why* they didn't
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
cimonav...@gmail.com wrote:
This is very very meta. But in my own defence, I haven't posted
anything for over a year. Mourning my dearly departed mother. I have
said before that monthly limits are prejudicial against those that
rarely
On 21 October 2011 16:02, Andrew Garrett agarr...@wikimedia.org wrote:
These discussions have gone in circles for a month now, and it's the
same five or ten people (yes, I am again being rhetorical, please
don't bother checking that number) arguing past each other and posting
their entrenched
