On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 04:05, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org wrote:
as I did. We both spend a lot of time making sure Wikipedia is always
up and available for people to read, so it's painful to see a small
proportion of a wiki's users decide to take a whole wiki offline for
everyone.
On 28 October 2011 13:48, Peter Gervai grin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 04:05, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org wrote:
as I did. We both spend a lot of time making sure Wikipedia is always
up and available for people to read, so it's painful to see a small
proportion of a
Hi,
Thank you for information, this tool looks very useful to help newbies! :)
Btw I have a few questions.
1. Are you going to enable this tool (MoodBar+Dashboard) on next wikis
or it depends on communities requests to enable it?
2. When this tool will support GENDER?
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 03:36:18PM -0700, Erik Moeller wrote:
Making it easy for editors to say, based on normal editorial judgment
and established practices in their project, Hey, reader, there's
something here you might not want to see ... and BTW, would you like
to remember that choice?
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 10:57:59AM +1100, Billinghurst wrote:
I do wish that this discussion can just move to implementation. This is about
what I get to filter for what I get to see, or when I get to see it. I have
had
enough of other people believing that they get to make their choices for
On 28 October 2011 20:08, Kim Bruning k...@bruning.xs4all.nl wrote:
I have the impression that most opposition comes from people with an IT
background. That is to say, people who have tried to figure it out, and have
had
some trouble finding a solution. (I may be biased, since that's my own
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 03:13:22PM -0700, Erik Moeller wrote:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Tobias Oelgarte
tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com wrote:
What approaches do you have in mind, that would empower the editors and
the readers, aside from an hide/show all solution?
1) Add a
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 08:49:42AM +0200, Nikola Smolenski wrote:
It is my understanding that parental software is often too overarching
or otherwise inadequate.
... and this despite (very likely) having a larger budget than the foundation
;-)
There's a reason the software is inadequate,
* Dirk Franke wrote:
the cultural homogenous group of Germans tends to discuss in German. So to
give you a short update on what is happening:
A White Bag protest movement against the image filter is forming.
And people who talked privately about a fork for some time, start to think
and say it
The WMF has been recently backing softwares that are a breach of
Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (1). Recently a totally stupid pink
heart was added to user talk pages, making people believe it is
Valentine Day everyday, with the result that Wikipedia is now being
used as a social network or a
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Teofilo teofilow...@gmail.com wrote:
Now we are seeing the appearance of a feedback tool on the English
Wikipedia ? How long are the non-English Wikipedias going to be free
from this new stupid tool which has nothing to do with writing an
encyclopaedia ?
In
I just built WikiLove to make giving barnstars easier. The WFM didn't
invent giving barnstars, that tradition was created by the community.
Since it's been going on for quite a few years, I think your complaint
is a bit late.
Ryan Kaldari
On 10/28/11 3:00 PM, Teofilo wrote:
The WMF has been
No good, the Grinch already stole Christmas. A juggernaut of foolishness
and play is bearing down on you...
Fred
The WMF has been recently backing softwares that are a breach of
Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (1). Recently a totally stupid pink
heart was added to user talk pages, making
It's disabled on certain wikis because of technical problems.
On 11-10-28 7:16 PM, Erik Moeller e...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Teofilo teofilow...@gmail.com wrote:
Now we are seeing the appearance of a feedback tool on the English
Wikipedia ? How long are the
On 10/28/11 3:27 PM, Etienne Beaule wrote:
It's disabled on certain wikis because of technical problems.
Oh? I wasn't aware that it had been disabled anywhere as yet.
WikiLove was not rolled out en mass; the policy for deployment of the
tool is that it is by request only,
I don't think that's accurate. WikiLove only has a single bug filed
against it, and it's just a feature request:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamednamedcmd=WikiLovelist_id=42901
If you know of any technical problems, please let me know.
And for those of you who hate
On incubator only, and probably the WikimediaIncubator extension. All was
set up.
On 11-10-28 7:31 PM, Brandon Harris bhar...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On 10/28/11 3:27 PM, Etienne Beaule wrote:
It's disabled on certain wikis because of technical problems.
Oh? I wasn't aware that it had
I find pink hearts depressing. Red hearts are okay, though. Mankind. It's a
troubling topic. Maybe in order to understand mankind, we have to look at
the word itself: “Mankind”. Basically, it’s made up of two separate words –
“mank” and “ind”. What do these words mean? It’s a mystery, and that’s
I think you deserve a barnstar (made via Wiki-love of course!) for that :-)
I've never really liked Mank, but I do like a spread of some Ind with my
tea in the morning.
Seriously though... in Wikilove can't the logo (the heart) and all of the
individual awards (barnstars, food, animals) be
19 matches
Mail list logo
