Probably not a good day for the Toolserver to have intermittent hardware errors
leading to the eligibility checker to time out frequently. It would be a good
idea to get someone to prioritise fixing it if you expect a mad rush to vote.
Cheers,
Neil
(QuiteUnusual@en.wikibooks)
Sent from my
Hello all,
Has there been any attempt to start a Wikimedia project focusing on free 3D
models?
I think, right now it would be the right timing for it. The prices of 3D
printers and other computer controlled machines are coming down [1] and there
are growing network of FabLabs around the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Per the above requests voiced on this list, I have created three smaller
resolution versions of the video in 720, 360 and 240p, which have been
uploaded to Wikimedia Commons by Reedy (thanks!).
The videos are linked at the original files' description
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:10 AM, Leinonen Teemu teemu.leino...@aalto.fiwrote:
Hello all,
Has there been any attempt to start a Wikimedia project focusing on free
3D models?
I think, right now it would be the right timing for it. The prices of 3D
printers and other computer controlled
2012/2/8 Steven Walling steven.wall...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:10 AM, Leinonen Teemu teemu.leino...@aalto.fiwrote:
Hello all,
Has there been any attempt to start a Wikimedia project focusing on free
3D models?
I think, right now it would be the right timing for it. The prices
If you are interested in the intellectual property issues facing 3D
printing, Public Knowledge has a white paper from 2010:
http://www.publicknowledge.org/it-will-be-awesome-if-they-dont-screw-it-up
Cheers,
Stephen
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:52 AM, HaeB haebw...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/2/8 Steven
On 8 February 2012 10:10, Leinonen Teemu teemu.leino...@aalto.fi wrote:
Has there been any attempt to start a Wikimedia project focusing on free 3D
models?
I think, right now it would be the right timing for it. The prices of 3D
printers and other computer controlled machines are coming
The Wikimedia Foundation Board is very pleased to welcome and approve
our 39th chapter, Wikimedia Kenya:
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolution:Recognition_of_Wikimedia_Kenya
Congratulations to all for your hard work!
-- Phoebe Ayers
WMF Board of Trustees Secretary
--
* I use this
Hello,
With great pleasure I allow me to join the congratulations to the
newest member of our family. I didn't know that it was so far when I
saw Abbas Mahmood in Amsterdam. It'll be great to hear more from
Wikimedia Kenya in future.
Certainly it is a lot of work to get a chapter established.
The English Wikipedia has become one of those sites with a feedback tab?
Example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Russell_Burnham.
How did this happen?
MZMcBride
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
Well, that would be part of the Article Feedback Tool, Version 5. We're
experimenting around with new placements - personally, I *loathe* this
design, but que sera. We'll be dropping it in a couple of weeks and playing
around with others.
On 9 February 2012 01:08, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com
Oliver Keyes wrote:
Well, that would be part of the Article Feedback Tool, Version 5. We're
experimenting around with new placements - personally, I *loathe* this
design, but que sera. We'll be dropping it in a couple of weeks and playing
around with others.
I think obstructing the content
As said above...it is being moved ;p
On 9 February 2012 01:18, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Oliver Keyes wrote:
Well, that would be part of the Article Feedback Tool, Version 5. We're
experimenting around with new placements - personally, I *loathe* this
design, but que sera. We'll
When this feature is enabled in other projects? It is very useful, and
necessary for all Wikimedia wikis.
Thanks!
2012/2/9, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org:
As said above...it is being moved ;p
On 9 February 2012 01:18, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Oliver Keyes wrote:
Well, that
We'll hopefully be finishing up development and testing within the next
couple of months; I'm not sure how we plan to handle deployment to other
wikis. Would you like me to find out?
On 9 February 2012 02:09, Minata Hatsune minhhuyw...@gmail.com wrote:
When this feature is enabled in other
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:08 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
The English Wikipedia has become one of those sites with a feedback tab?
Example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Russell_Burnham.
How did this happen?
Eww. Why is it called Improve this page?
It allows readers to
Uhm. Can I require to enable in any project through MediaZilla (such
as my homewiki)? Anyway, it should be deployment to many wiki, help
improve content quality.
2012/2/9, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org:
We'll hopefully be finishing up development and testing within the next
couple of
Minata: I imagine the plan is deploy on enwiki, and if other wikis ask for
it, they can have it too, but I'll find out :).
In reply to It allows readers to provide feedback; that feedback is not
likely to
result in improvements except in rare cases - actually, no. We ran several
rounds of
Okay, Minata: looks like I was right; if wikis want it after the design
process is finished, they can just ask for it.
On 9 February 2012 02:31, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Minata: I imagine the plan is deploy on enwiki, and if other wikis ask
for it, they can have it too, but
On 2/8/12 6:42 PM, Oliver Keyes wrote:
Okay, Minata: looks like I was right; if wikis want it after the design
process is finished, they can just ask for it.
Let's be clear about our (admittedly informal) policy here:
If a wiki wants to have it deployed, they will have to ensure
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Brandon Harris bhar...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Let's be clear about our (admittedly informal) policy here:
What is informal about our process?
* Community gains consenus for feature to be activated (and the
desired config if required)
* Bug gets filled in
Well, has it ever been written down anywhere and solidified as Official
Standard Operating Procedure? If not, structured or not, it's informal ;)
On 9 February 2012 03:20, K. Peachey p858sn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Brandon Harris bhar...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Well, has it ever been written down anywhere and solidified as Official
Standard Operating Procedure? If not, structured or not, it's informal ;)
It is definitely way past the realm of everyone knows this is the way
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Minata: I imagine the plan is deploy on enwiki, and if other wikis ask for
it, they can have it too, but I'll find out :).
In reply to It allows readers to provide feedback; that feedback is not
likely to
result in
On the first one, no idea - if you have any idea how we can test this
without full deployment, please, go ahead. On the second, it should scale;
we're using a randomised sample (minus DAB pages)
On 9 February 2012 04:17, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 1:31 PM,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On the first one, no idea - if you have any idea how we can test this
without full deployment, please, go ahead.
feedback was sent to contributors?
did the contributor make use of the feedback?
if not, why not?
On the
We'll experiment with wordings as the testing progresses. On your other
point - again, how can we find this out without testing it? If little is
done with it, we can look into junking it, but nothing ventured...
On 9 February 2012 04:34, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 9,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote:
We'll experiment with wordings as the testing progresses. On your other
point - again, how can we find this out without testing it? If little is
done with it, we can look into junking it, but nothing ventured...
you say
Sure..except we weren't asking contributors to use this feedback to fix up
the articles. I do know that even without any standing system to improve
it, several article improvements were made. All I can give you
quantifiably, though, is that editors saw the feedback, and thought a big
chunk of it
29 matches
Mail list logo
