Re: [Foundation-l] Movement roles letter, Feb 2012

2012-02-13 Thread Alec Meta
I'm happy to see the Partner Organization possibility being given serious consideration. I'm a longtime believer that organizations with Wikimedia values need to band together into some larger umbrella organizational structure. I hope this new framework will allow us to return to a more

Re: [Foundation-l] Adding a comment section under every Wikipedia article

2012-01-26 Thread Alec Meta
Yao Ziyuan is thinking along the right lines. Wikipedia can be more than it currently is. We need experiments, we need to be experimental again. FT2 makes the excellent case that we need a level of 'insulation' to protect our existing project from the potential negative effects of failed

Re: [Foundation-l] Resolution:Developing Scenarios for future of fundraising

2012-01-18 Thread Alec Meta
Why does the Board of Trustees think that WMF should raise the «maximum possible amount of money»? Why not ask for what is needed and nothing more? Because we don't expect to be JUST Wikipedia forever. We have a lot of innovation ahead of us. If we stand still, we'll be overtaken. With

[Foundation-l] THIS is why we support WMF! Sincere thanks for a blackout.

2012-01-17 Thread Alec Meta
Wikimedia is a movement. We're not a game, we're not a website, we're not even just an encyclopedia-- we're a nonviolent revolution in information sharing. For-profit media is harder to trust-- we've seen that For-profit media often means For sale. In a time where it's hard to trust a congress