Am 29.10.2011 21:57, schrieb Mateus Nobre:
This is inconsistent for me. Wikilove's a global improvement, there's no
reason to disagree improvements.
Huh,I knew I shoulda taken that left turn at/Albuquerque/. How exactly is it a
global improvement? Quite frankly I couldn't think of anything
Hi,
I believe that most points are valid, but I disagree with item no. 11.
The first part has already been mentioned in the thread following Ting
Chen's letter with a statement that the board intends to make this a
visible feature in all Wikimedia projects, and when people probed about
it, I
Am 05.10.2011 06:25, schrieb Aaron Adrignola:
Should I expect that de.wikipedia would be allowed to stage
a similar blackout should the image filter be implemented against their
wishes, with the goal of protesting perceived or potential censorship?
You can pretty much count on that. And
Am 30.09.2011 16:24, schrieb Risker:
The implication of your post is if you're a woman from
the US, your opinion is invalid. Your post here did not further the
discussion in any way, and I politely ask you to refrain from making such
posts in the future.
Weird. I've only seen a post where
Am 30.09.2011 16:46, schrieb Risker:
My question to you is why anyone would want to participate in a discussion
where their opinions are going to be classified by their sex or their
geographic location rather than their input.
There's absolutely no harm in coming to a finding that, say, 80% of
Am 23.09.2011 14:03, schrieb m...@marcusbuck.org:
I think the same is happening here. The majority of people probably
think that an optional opt-in filter is a thing that does no harm to
non-users and has advantages for those who choose to use it. (Ask your
gramma whether You can hide pictures
Am 18.09.2011 13:56, schrieb Andre Engels:
On itself the one who tags the image, but we happen to have a system for
that in Wikimedia. It is called discussion and trying to reach consent. Who
decides whether a page is in a category? Who decides whether a page has an
image? Who decides whether
Am 18.09.2011 15:58, schrieb Fred Bauder:
I do support censorship. There is absolutely no excuse for hosting an
image of Mohammad as a dog, but this is a Rube Goldburg boondoggle.
Nothing wrong with hosting that picture
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Muh-hund-original-rondellliten.JPG ).
Am 16.09.2011 10:40, schrieb Peter Gervai:
I believe it is a fair assumption that we have voted for developing
the feature, so wikipedias who need it can activate and use it, while
those who do not want to use it will not request its activation, or
will request its deactivation. I see no
Am 16.09.2011 12:39, schrieb emijrp:
There are more issues with images in German Wikipedia.
And on the other hand pictures are deleted from Commons because there is
no FOP in the country where the pictures was taken.
Regards,
Oliver
___
foundation-l
Am 16.09.2011 13:22, schrieb emijrp:
Again, who are we? And why do German laws matter with USA servers? Why
does only German Wikipedia exclude that images? Are English Wikipedia or
Commons blocked in Germany?
It's not like the picture is used in every Wikipedia either.
How about we just agree
11 matches
Mail list logo
