On 09/16/11 12:38 PM, Robert Rohde wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:01 PM, emijrpemi...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that the phrase meaning refered to Wikipedia is the sum of all
human knowledge which is notable and encyclopedic.
Not ALL, ALL, ALL human knowledge. MySpace discarded.
When you
I'm afraid it sounds a bit OT, but I'm serious, really.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Ziko van Dijk zvand...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello,
Today I read on a WMDE driven website:
»Stellen Sie sich eine Welt vor, in der das gesamte Wissen der
Menschheit jedem frei zugänglich ist. Das ist
And I think that there is a huge difference between the sum of
all... and all By the way, the traditional encyclopedias
described themselves by the sum of all...
Can you explain this perceived difference? Is the whole more than the
sum of its parts, so that the German claim is too
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:01 PM, emijrp emi...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that the phrase meaning refered to Wikipedia is the sum of all
human knowledge which is notable and encyclopedic.
Not ALL, ALL, ALL human knowledge. MySpace discarded.
When you look back to when that quote was issued (at
Hi;
Perhaps, you may want to help me compiling information about this topic and
improving the estimate.[1]
There is a false sensation about Wikipedia being almost complete. In the
other hand, projects like WikiSource are in their infance, for example,
Internet Archive hosts about 3 million
