Hey guys!
Another AFT session - this one will be in #wikimedia-office on 2 December,
at 19:00 UTC. If you're vaguely interested in playing around with
prototypes, you should attend - we'll have a lot of cool stuff to poke at
(and then complain about when something breaks and it goes all melty).
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hey guys!
Another AFT session - this one will be in #wikimedia-office on 2 December,
at 19:00 UTC. If you're vaguely interested in playing around with
prototypes, you should attend - we'll have a lot of cool stuff to
Indeed; an hour beforehand :). We'll be jumping in right as he ends.
On 29 November 2011 17:23, Theo10011 de10...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Hey guys!
Another AFT session - this one will be in #wikimedia-office on 2
would it be possible to have a rating for pictures as well?
On Nov 29, 2011 6:17 PM, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hey guys!
Another AFT session - this one will be in #wikimedia-office on 2 December,
at 19:00 UTC. If you're vaguely interested in playing around with
prototypes, you
Well, if you've seen AFT5 (you may not have, so -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_Feedback_Tool/Version_5)
we're moving away from rating articles.
On 29 November 2011 19:13, rupert THURNER rupert.thur...@gmail.com wrote:
would it be possible to have a rating for pictures as well?
that looks really nice, as well the intention behind it! for pictures, or
commons in general, a rating model like the one already implements would be
more appropriate, what you think?
On Nov 29, 2011 8:20 PM, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Well, if you've seen AFT5 (you may not have,
It'd be good! I'm not sure what the usefulness would be, though. So, the
two aims behind the AFT:
- To prompt greater feedback from readers on the quality of content;
- To try (through the calls to action, which have actually been pretty
successful) to prompt readers to edit.
I'm not
the longer I think about it, the more I like the direction it takes. as you
allow texts now, would it be thinkable to generalise this in future
versions to make it having post-it functionality?
this means in three directions:
first, can be placed anywhere onto the article even covering things.
one usage could be to support photo competitions as wiki loves monuments,
where a jury had to select good photos out of 16 submitted.
On Nov 29, 2011 8:51 PM, Oliver Keyes oke...@wikimedia.org wrote:
It'd be good! I'm not sure what the usefulness would be, though. So, the
two aims behind
That's certainly an idea.
I don't think post-its are on the table right now - that's probably a bit
outside the project's scope.
On 29 November 2011 20:06, rupert THURNER rupert.thur...@gmail.com wrote:
one usage could be to support photo competitions as wiki loves monuments,
where a jury had
10 matches
Mail list logo
