no marked leap either way in August 2008.
A.
--- On Thu, 30/9/10, Risker wrote:
> From: Risker
> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Differences between projects with common versus
> highly diverse cultural backgrounds (was Re: Pending Changes)
> To: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing
On 30 September 2010 04:02, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
> Anne,
>
> Thanks for the extra perspective. The post-2007 decline in 100+ editors on
> en:WP may indeed reflect a decline in vandalism reverts.
>
> The most interesting point to me was that de:WP introduced flagged
> revisions in spring 2008, acr
Everybody,
Sorry for the previous blunder. I'd like to point out that the Flagged
Revvs were switched on in the "culturally diverse" Russian Wikipedia in the
August 2008 and we don't see significant changes in the editors numbers.
Once the initial opposition to a bold decision of a couple of admi
Anne,
Thanks for the extra perspective. The post-2007 decline in 100+ editors on
en:WP may indeed reflect a decline in vandalism reverts.
The most interesting point to me was that de:WP introduced flagged revisions in
spring 2008, across the board, and that editor numbers appear to have remain
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Risker wrote:
> On 29 September 2010 23:32, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
>
>> > Andreas Kolbe
>> > wrote:
>> > > German Wikipedia has had pending changes implemented
>> > *globally*, in all articles, for several years now. Unlike
>> > en:WP, where numbers of active edito
On 29 September 2010 23:32, Andreas Kolbe wrote:
> > Andreas Kolbe
> > wrote:
> > > German Wikipedia has had pending changes implemented
> > *globally*, in all articles, for several years now. Unlike
> > en:WP, where numbers of active editors have dropped
> > significantly since 2007, numbers of
