On 21 January 2012 22:57, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
David, I'm a bit surprised that you think a policy that includes the
language Sexual language and imagery is not appropriate for any conference
venue or talks. is a good idea. I think it'd be difficult to have a
discussion about
On 01/21/2012 11:13 PM, MZMcBride wrote:
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Friendly_space_policy
[…] regardless of […] preferred Creative Commons license […]
I use the GNU General Public License v3 / GNU Free Documentation License
v1.3, as commanded by Saint IGNUcius, you insensitive clod!
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 05:54:34PM -0500, MZMcBride wrote:
Steven Walling wrote:
If a policy makes good sense, we clearly need it, and feedback about the
text is mostly positive, then we should adopt it. Rejecting a good idea
because of process wonkery is stupid.
Really? Does this apply
A new policy should always be announced on foundation-l; forwarding.
MZMcBride
-- Forwarded Message
From: Sumana Harihareswara suma...@wikimedia.org
Organization: Wikimedia Foundation
Reply-To: Wikimedia developers wikitec...@lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:30:07 -0800
To:
Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
Thanks to all of you for your feedback on this. We've now finalized the
policy and it now lives at
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Friendly_space_policy
I don't think the Volunteer Development Coordinator (or any Wikimedia
Foundation employee) has the power
David Gerard wrote:
On 21 January 2012 22:50, Steven Walling steven.wall...@gmail.com wrote:
If a policy makes good sense, we clearly need it, and feedback about the
text is mostly positive, then we should adopt it. Rejecting a good idea
because of process wonkery is stupid.
+1
David,
MZMcBride, 21/01/2012 23:32:
Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
Thanks to all of you for your feedback on this. We've now finalized the
policy and it now lives at
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Friendly_space_policy
I don't think the Volunteer Development Coordinator (or any Wikimedia
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 2:57 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
I think it'd be difficult to have a
discussion about Wikimedia Commons with a rule like this.
Right now, the policy is pretty much framed around technical events
like hackathons, because that was what motivated its creation.
1]On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 2:57 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
David, I'm a bit surprised that you think a policy that includes the
language Sexual language and imagery is not appropriate for any conference
venue or talks. is a good idea. I think it'd be difficult to have a
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 5:32 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Sumana Harihareswara wrote:
Thanks to all of you for your feedback on this. We've now finalized the
policy and it now lives at
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Friendly_space_policy
Thank you for working on this,
I fully supported this policy's development and feel volunteers impacted by it
were directly involved in its authoring.
Should the intro be modified to make it clearer this is for tech conferences?
Although I personally didn't find that confusing.
MZMcBride - I guess I'm unclear what the
Mr. Gregory Varnum, 22/01/2012 00:33:
MZMcBride - I guess I'm unclear what the purpose of this thread is. Just a FYI
or are you asking for something specific to be done? I'm not sure how you got
confused about its scope given the listserv you forwarded this from which
outlined all this in
12 matches
Mail list logo
