This is sort of unrelated, but may be of interest to the people
discussing language issues with search:
http://googleenterprise.blogspot.com/2008/12/cross-language-enterprise-search.html
Google is announcing some cross language searching for enterprise now
anyway, where you might search in one
2008/12/16 Michael Peel em...@mikepeel.net:
It is still a very useful feature, though. It's a pity that you can't
have two watchlists on en.wp, such that you can use one to keep an
eye on articles you're particularly attached to, with the other
handling all the rest.
I find that a useful
On 13 Dec 2008, at 14:02, Platonides wrote:
teun spaans wrote:
Many times it works well.
But the procedures also irregularly goes amiss.
I also received deletion messages of a pic i had uploaded with a
correct
license. Some wikimedian had accidently removed the license,
making a bot
teun spaans wrote:
Many times it works well.
But the procedures also irregularly goes amiss.
I also received deletion messages of a pic i had uploaded with a correct
license. Some wikimedian had accidently removed the license, making a bot
come along and warn me. By pure coincidence i
Pharos wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 6:28 PM, Nikola Smolenski smole...@eunet.yu wrote:
On Tuesday 09 December 2008 08:23:07 Gerard Meijssen wrote:
When people from other projects tell me that this is one of the reasons why
they do not bother with Commons, I have to disbelieve them? Try to
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote:
teun spaans wrote:
Many times it works well.
But the procedures also irregularly goes amiss.
I also received deletion messages of a pic i had uploaded with a correct
license. Some wikimedian had accidently removed
The commons issue is not just a language issua. If it was it was
solvable. It is a hositility issue. Where people who upload the second
picture of the same object (like a TukTuk) get told it is not necassary
because the project already has one picture of a TukTuk . The
problem is that the
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 7:23 AM, Gerard Meijssen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hoi,
When people from other projects tell me that this is one of the reasons why
they do not bother with Commons, I have to disbelieve them? Try to find
paard and you will not be served in the same way as with horse the
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Magnus Manske
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 7:23 AM, Gerard Meijssen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hoi,
When people from other projects tell me that this is one of the reasons why
they do not bother with Commons, I have to disbelieve them? Try to
Hoi,
An answer like that justifies and inforces the notion that Commons is only
for those that can read / write English. To me this is not acceptable
because it degrades Commons to less then what it should be, what it could
be.
Thanks,
GerardM
2008/12/9 Magnus Manske [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
On Tuesday 09 December 2008 08:23:07 Gerard Meijssen wrote:
When people from other projects tell me that this is one of the reasons why
they do not bother with Commons, I have to disbelieve them? Try to find
paard and you will not be served in the same way as with horse the
search result is
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 1:00 PM, David Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I speak as a big fan of and participant in Wikimedia Commons.
But: Is it time to deprecate Commons as a WMF service project? It's
clearly failing and the local community is actively hostile to
contributors from other wikis.
Hoi,
When people from other projects tell me that this is one of the reasons why
they do not bother with Commons, I have to disbelieve them? Try to find
paard and you will not be served in the same way as with horse the
search result is inferior. Dutch is not the worst option, try ίππος and
you
Discussions please. (Not denial that this problem is a problem, thanks.)
If you want to encourage discussion, don't start by restricting the
discussion to only people that agree with you. You won't get any
useful results that way.
___
foundation-l
2008/12/6 Thomas Dalton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Discussions please. (Not denial that this problem is a problem, thanks.)
If you want to encourage discussion, don't start by restricting the
discussion to only people that agree with you. You won't get any
useful results that way.
Are you speaking
2008/12/6 David Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/12/6 Thomas Dalton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Discussions please. (Not denial that this problem is a problem, thanks.)
If you want to encourage discussion, don't start by restricting the
discussion to only people that agree with you. You won't get any
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Saturday, December 6, 2008 1:00:29 PM
Subject: [Foundation-l] Fwd: [Commons-l] Making Wikimedia Commons less
frightening
I speak as a big fan of and participant in Wikimedia Commons.
But: Is it time
on 12/6/08 4:04 PM, Thomas Dalton at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Discussions please. (Not denial that this problem is a problem, thanks.)
If you want to encourage discussion, don't start by restricting the
discussion to only people that agree with you. You won't get any
useful results that
on 12/6/08 4:10 PM, David Gerard at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/12/6 Thomas Dalton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Discussions please. (Not denial that this problem is a problem, thanks.)
If you want to encourage discussion, don't start by restricting the
discussion to only people that agree with
19 matches
Mail list logo
