Hoi,
There are language issues that are not addressed. It is known for instance
that the Safari browser supports Lingala better then Firefox and Opera. This
is because Safari does NOT use a monospaced font in the edit screen. An
obvious but not so elegant solution would be to have these other two
Gerard Meijssen wrote:
I will be indeed the last to say that the Betawiki developers are not part
of the community of MediaWiki developers. The point that I tried to make
here is that when the Lingala community produces its *own *developer, they
will have a better grasp of the issues with the
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 5:26 AM, Gerard Meijssen
gerard.meijs...@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi,
Can someone please explain why this is ?
Thanks,
GerardM
Also, some of the (to use the same language as the poster) first
class wikis (top 10 on article count, on numbr of visits,
wikipedia.org main
Hoi,
I had a word with Duesentrieb, he works for the German chapter, and he told
me that the server issue is indeed a case of bad luck. He had some good news
as well, Duesentrieb and some other Tool Server developers are looking into
localisation for the tool server software. When the tool server
Hoi,
A conspiracy is wilful. I doubt that this is the case. If anything there is
neglect. Other languages are just not given the same priority. What you hope
for is that over time a language community will include developers that will
take care for its language issues. In the mean time the
Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
A conspiracy is wilful. I doubt that this is the case. If anything there is
neglect. Other languages are just not given the same priority.
There's no language-dependence in our priorities here, except for Robert's
initial decision, back in October, to pilot the new
