*John Vandenberg: **Which project has had ArbCom members that were not
admins?
*
Portuguese ArbCom members does not need to be an adm too. See please:
http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conselho_de_arbitragem/Elei%C3%A7%C3%B5es
_
Béria Lima (Beh)
Wikimedia Portugal
2010/12/6 John
Dutch Wikipedia has multible members that aren't admins
2010/12/6, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.com wrote:
Sinds its not only English Wikipedia but foundation wide I can say we have
people becomming Arbcom without being a
On 4 December 2010 23:42, Virgilio A. P. Machado v...@fct.unl.pt wrote:
Could you please tell how long you have been around Wikimedia
projects? I would like to have an idea of how much time it takes to
find out that we have at least three hierarchical structures. You
left out at least Santa
Sinds its not only English Wikipedia but foundation wide I can say we have
people becomming Arbcom without being a Admin.. We had CheckUsers without
being a admin. So its not a ladder.
Huib
2010/12/4 wjhon...@aol.com
In a message dated 12/4/2010 6:50:38 AM Pacific Standard Time,
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Huib Laurens sterke...@gmail.com wrote:
Sinds its not only English Wikipedia but foundation wide I can say we have
people becomming Arbcom without being a Admin.. We had CheckUsers without
being a admin. So its not a ladder.
Hi Huib,
Which project has had
In a message dated 12/4/2010 6:50:38 AM Pacific Standard Time,
geni...@gmail.com writes:
Actually we have at least 3.
Editor, admin bureaucrat, steward, dev.
everyone, arbcom
Everyone, foundation, foundation board.
Not three Geni, one.
Has anyone become Arbcom without being an
On 4 December 2010 16:56, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 12/4/2010 6:50:38 AM Pacific Standard Time,
geni...@gmail.com writes:
Actually we have at least 3.
Editor, admin bureaucrat, steward, dev.
everyone, arbcom
Everyone, foundation, foundation board.
Not three Geni,
Could you please tell how long you have been around Wikimedia
projects? I would like to have an idea of how much time it takes to
find out that we have at least three hierarchical structures. You
left out at least Santa Claus.
Totally dismayed,
Virgilio A. P. Machado
At 14:50 04-12-2010,
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:11 AM, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Has anyone become Bureaucrat without being an admin?
Doesn't De having something like that
German Wikipedia? Their crats are all admins. German Wikipedia have
a rule that a checkuser, oversighter, and arbcom are all distinct
In a message dated 11/27/2010 7:05:39 AM Pacific Standard Time,
russnel...@gmail.com writes:
Nothing in their experience base can be used
unless it's already in print somewhere ... so how is their experience
useful? I'm not calling into question the [[citation needed]] policy, but
instead
In a message dated 11/25/2010 9:14:20 AM Pacific Standard Time,
wing.phil...@gmx.de writes:
I think it is very important for us to understand the difficulties
academics face if they want to join the Wikimedian community. And maybe
we should rethink about our strategy and approach on
.
A.
--- On Thu, 25/11/10, wjhon...@aol.com wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
From: wjhon...@aol.com wjhon...@aol.com
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Fwd: Re: [VereinDE-l] Bericht zur Verleihung der
Zedler-Me...
To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Thursday, 25 November, 2010, 17:56
In a message
In a message dated 11/25/2010 10:57:11 AM Pacific Standard Time,
jayen...@yahoo.com writes:
It's a headache for the copyright team on en:WP because they have to
figure out which came first.
First there should be a presumption that established editors (I've been
in-project for seven
On 25 November 2010 22:15, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
We have Geni, many ways to determine if someone is an established editor.
Name one that doesn't boil down to editcountitis
We have flags already to mark people as established editors in addition to
that.
I for one have no wish to turn
In a message dated 11/25/2010 3:31:07 PM Pacific Standard Time,
geni...@gmail.com writes:
On 25 November 2010 22:15, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
We have Geni, many ways to determine if someone is an established
editor.
Name one that doesn't boil down to editcountitis
We have flags
Dear Mr. Will Johnson,
Three hurrays for the separations of powers, checks and balances and
full accountability to oneself, others and the foundations of a
civilized community.
You got my attention and my empathy.
Virgilio A. P. Machado
At 19:43 25-11-2010, you wrote:
In a message dated
In a message dated 11/25/2010 3:31:07 PM Pacific Standard Time,
geni...@gmail.com writes:
On 25 November 2010 22:15, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
We have Geni, many ways to determine if someone is an established
editor.
Name one that doesn't boil down to editcountitis
We have flags
Okay, but that's just to control the power of the monopoly federal
government, which is STRICTLY limited in what it can do (unfortunately, most
Americans have forgotten that part). To control the power of the states
(which is where nearly everything SHOULD be done), there is nothing that a
state
18 matches
Mail list logo
