On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Kim Bruning wrote:
> WebM is a new open source video codec; That's interesting
> with a BSD-ish license; Ok, that's amazing
> Google did it; That's huge.
>
> The question to this esteemed community is thus:
> Shall we start using it? :-)
Careful about rushing in t
On 19 May 2010 22:21, Jon Davis wrote:
> No, the real question is: Is it _actually_ free?
>
> Read the OVA page about VP8 (
> http://openvideoalliance.org/2010/05/google-frees-vp8-codec-for-html5-the-webm-project/?l=en).
> Specifically "What's the catch?". In short, MPEG-LA group claims
> that
>
No, the real question is: Is it _actually_ free?
Read the OVA page about VP8 (
http://openvideoalliance.org/2010/05/google-frees-vp8-codec-for-html5-the-webm-project/?l=en).
Specifically "What's the catch?". In short, MPEG-LA group claims
that
their patents cover all modern video codecs.
So, h
Hoi,
Check out my blog
http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.com/2010/05/new-wikipedia-related-logo-just-spotted.html
Thanks,
GerardM
On 19 May 2010 23:18, Kim Bruning wrote:
> WebM is a new open source video codec; That's interesting
> with a BSD-ish license; Ok, that's amazing
> Google did i
WebM is a new open source video codec; That's interesting
with a BSD-ish license; Ok, that's amazing
Google did it; That's huge.
The question to this esteemed community is thus:
Shall we start using it? :-)
sincerely,
Kim Bruning
--
[Non-pgp mail clients may show pgp-signature as attach
