Hello,
This whole thread is interesting. You can work side by side with someone for
several years and not know that the Wikipedia next door delete talk pages
where the question is resolved.
Yeah. We are forks.
Anyway, I published an essay about raising quality on the Swedish Wikipedia
a
The Russian Wikipedia has copied your Mistakes report script but we often
transfer the reports to the discussion pages for correction of wikipedians
looking after their articles.
Victoria
In pl wiki reports are moved too, but only if problem is not solved on the
Zgłoś błąd site.
Przykuta, 11/10/2010 08:37:
BTW - I've seen, that in some (smaller) Wikipedias newbies are welcome by
bots. We try welcome only users with any activity and newbies are welcome by
[[MediaWiki:Welcomecreation]] page with links to help pages.
[[MediaWiki:Welcomecreation]] is almost useless,
Przykuta, 11/10/2010 08:37:
BTW - I've seen, that in some (smaller) Wikipedias newbies are welcome by
bots. We try welcome only users with any activity and newbies are welcome
by [[MediaWiki:Welcomecreation]] page with links to help pages.
[[MediaWiki:Welcomecreation]] is almost
Przykuta, 11/10/2010 09:27:
Huh. Yes, but when bot welcome newbie, he can't help this user.
Bots usually add a random signature from a list of experienced users
willing to help.
Nemo
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Hello,
This whole thread is interesting. You can work side by side with someone for
several years and not know that the Wikipedia next door delete talk pages
where the question is resolved.
Anyway, I published an essay about raising quality on the Swedish Wikipedia
a couple of years ago, which
*Dzień dobry, *Przykuta
One of Wikipedia perennial dilemmas is quantity vs. quality. Low depth and
low articles to non-auricles ratio usually a sign that too many articles
were created semiautomatically, by bots and the community is spread too thin
e.g. there is not enough people to correct and
2010/10/10 Виктория mstisla...@gmail.com:
*Dzień dobry, *Przykuta
One of Wikipedia perennial dilemmas is quantity vs. quality. Low depth and
low articles to non-auricles ratio usually a sign that too many articles
were created semiautomatically, by bots and the community is spread too thin
So perhaps it's something about the way the Polish Wikipedia works? A
few thoughts:
* Polish doesn't host any images - unlike most other projects - so
there's no need for image pages, image talkpages, etc. On some
projects, such as German, as many as 6% of pages are in the image
Old talk pages with solved problems are deleted.
This is extremely strange. Talk pages are part of the article history.
Ortega's thesis should be updated, perhaps.
«The combination of a very active cohort of bots, together
with the very low ratio of talk pages, indicates that the Polish
Czesc all,
On 10 Oct 2010, at 06:54, Przykuta wrote:
Hi
In pl wiki depth is very weak. We have many edits, like other bigger
Wikipedias, but Ratio is problematical (Non-Articles/Articles). We have not a
lot of non-article pages. Could you help us? Any ideas?
Does pl.wp have WikiProjects? If not, then perhaps this could explain the
reduced number of non-article edits, given how many pages on en.wp only have
wikiproject templates on their talk pages (or cases where having a
non-redlink has promoted discussions).
Thanks,
Mike Peel
Sure,
I am not sure that deleting disccusion pages as a default is a good thing.
If the discussion page exists some people will check it out of curosity and
stay on the site longer, may be add their comments. Red scares many users,
they don't know how to create a new page. Of course I don't like this
Hi
In pl wiki depth is very weak. We have many edits, like other bigger
Wikipedias, but Ratio is problematical (Non-Articles/Articles). We have not a
lot of non-article pages. Could you help us? Any ideas?
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Non-Articles/Articles
14 matches
Mail list logo
