2011/7/1 Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com:
As Russia is fairly developed country, it is likely that reaching people
who speak those languages and teaching them how to use Wikimedia
projects would the task for WM RU. Besides that, I think that all
languages of Russia have writing systems and
Milosh, thanks for your work. Just to correct: Moksha, Erzya, Yakut
(=Sakha), Komi-Zyrian (=Komi) and Lak all have Wikipedias (though
admittedly for Lak I am the only active contributor). Adyge is almost
identical to Kabardino-Circassian, and Adyge speakers probably will never
have their own
2011/7/1 Yaroslav M. Blanter pute...@mccme.ru:
Adyge is almost
identical to Kabardino-Circassian, and Adyge speakers probably will never
have their own Wikipedia.
From what i hear about this, Adyge and Kabardian may be two varieties
of a Circassian [[macrolanguage]]. Maybe someone who cares
On 07/01/2011 01:24 PM, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote:
Milosh, thanks for your work. Just to correct: Moksha, Erzya, Yakut
(=Sakha), Komi-Zyrian (=Komi) and Lak all have Wikipedias (though
admittedly for Lak I am the only active contributor). Adyge is almost
identical to Kabardino-Circassian, and
On 06/27/2011 12:30 AM, M. Williamson wrote:
Some of these actually already have Wikipedias:
Meadow Mari
Yakut (aka Sakha)
Lak
Balkar (aka Karachay-Balkar)
Yiddish, Eastern (= standard Yiddish, Western Yiddish is the one we are
missing but it has much fewer speakers; according to
More data could be found at [1]. It is about coverage of languages by
Wikimedia projects by size of population, logarithmic.
Numbers are not a surprise.
[1]
https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=tCwO11tFPLPB-SJafDesypgauthkey=CPCE5pMB#gid=1
Some of these actually already have Wikipedias:
Meadow Mari
Yakut (aka Sakha)
Lak
Balkar (aka Karachay-Balkar)
Yiddish, Eastern (= standard Yiddish, Western Yiddish is the one we are
missing but it has much fewer speakers; according to Ethnologue there are
only 5,400 around the world)
In
Hi,
On 25 Jun 2011, at 05:52, Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com wrote:
While preparing Missing Wikipedias [1], I've got numbers of speakers and
languages by area and country with chapter not covered by Wikipedias.
Fascinating! Thanks for the work! :-)
Isabell.
Forwarding Deryk Chan's email and my response on his request.
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Internal-l] Fwd: [Foundation-l] Languages and numbers
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 13:55:58 +0200
From: Milos Rancic mill...@gmail.com
To: Deryck Chan deryckc...@gmail.com
On 06/25/2011 01:28
: [Foundation-l] Languages and numbers
To: Wikimedia India Community list wikimediaindi...@lists.wikimedia.org
It is fascinating, although I think I may not have understood the
classifications. Is there only one Indian Sign Language, for instance? I was
told by a user (in the UK) that several
On 06/25/2011 03:11 PM, Bishakha Datta wrote:
I posted this on the India list (many people are not subscribed to
foundation-l) - forwarding this question which just popped up.
First of all, although numbers look fascinatingly precise, they are far
from that. When you make a sum of
While preparing Missing Wikipedias [1], I've got numbers of speakers and
languages by area and country with chapter not covered by Wikipedias.
Numbers are preliminary, some of them should be corrected. I didn't
exclude Han languages, which mostly shouldn't be counted, and similar.
Note, also,
12 matches
Mail list logo
