Does anyone feel that the Wikiquette is too weak to enforce the
respect aspect of the five pillars?
I wonder if we should make RFC/U a lot easier for cases where
administrators show a pattern of not handling new editors very well.
If [[WP:WQA]] had some teeth, say 3 reports against an admin and
Fred, I'm guessing you are asking for the benefit of others on this
non-en.wp focused list. RFC/U is a user conduct Request for Comments,
WQA is a noticeboard for wikiquette alerts (basically, people go there
to complain when someone else is rude), and RfA is the process by
which people become
Oops, sorry Fred,
On Wikipedia I have a nice acronym expanding script to make sure I
don't get locked into jargon, particularly useful when explaining
things to newer editors.
Cheers,
Fae
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Fae f...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
Oops, sorry Fred,
On Wikipedia I have a nice acronym expanding script to make sure I
don't get locked into jargon, particularly useful when explaining
things to newer editors.
Cheers,
Fae
Uhm... where can I get that
It's a WP USCRIPT at WP:TLA/TL:DR/TTP. DL it on the QT because it's TS and
you'll get KP if found out.
:P
On 7 November 2011 16:10, Philippe Beaudette phili...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Fae f...@wikimedia.org.uk wrote:
Oops, sorry Fred,
On Wikipedia I have a
Hi Philippe,
I use an iMacro script, which is probably pretty geeky. Someone with a
bit of JavaScript knowledge could probably find a way of getting it
turned into a more maintable wiki user script.
Source code link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fae/Geek/fullNameOfShortcut
Cheers,
Fae
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 04:18:54PM +, Oliver Keyes wrote:
It's a WP USCRIPT at WP:TLA/TL:DR/TTP. DL it on the QT because it's TS and
you'll get KP if found out.
ZOMG, you violated WP:WOTTA [1] !
sincerely,
Kim There's a policy for that Bruning.
[1]
