Ral I know you'd like to give the benefit of good faith to all admins.
However, if we actually have admins who are deleting articles so quickly
that they fat-finger the *reasons* then we have a serious problem.
No thinkee is quite close to admin abuse.
As a community we should be bending over
In a message dated 2/19/2011 4:18:52 PM Pacific Standard Time,
thewub.w...@googlemail.com writes:
Deletion log for Makmende:
* 00:37, 24 March 2010 Flyguy649 (talk | contribs) deleted “Makmende”
? (CSD G3: Pure Vandalism)
* 22:53, 23 March 2010 Malik Shabazz (talk | contribs) deleted
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 7:53 PM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
I have a problem with this admin comprehending what exactly Vandalism
means.
In what way is the initial version vandalism.
If I cared enough I would suggest that re-training might be appropriate
here.
W
The third incarnation of
On 2/20/11, Ryan Lomonaco wiki.ral...@gmail.com wrote:
The third incarnation of the article (the one that was labeled vandalism)
was labeled as a hoax under CSD G3 by an IP editor. It looks like the
admin meant to delete it as a hoax, but picked the wrong option from the
drop-down box -- G3
On 20 February 2011 10:57, Marco Chiesa chiesa.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
Please consider that this is foundation-l and for many people CSD G3
is pretty meaningless
Cruccone
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CSD#G3
But we are talking about en's deletion procedures. Not being able to
work
I have read this article this morning,
Well this is a similar problem I am having with adding details to, or new
articles about Kosovo,
even my attempts are getting deleted. Having problems even getting the
Turkish, Bosnian or Albanian alternative names added without being deleted,
even if
On 2/20/11, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 February 2011 10:57, Marco Chiesa chiesa.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
Please consider that this is foundation-l and for many people CSD G3
is pretty meaningless
Cruccone
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CSD#G3
But we are talking about en's
On 20 February 2011 15:49, Marco Chiesa chiesa.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/20/11, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 February 2011 10:57, Marco Chiesa chiesa.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
Please consider that this is foundation-l and for many people CSD G3
is pretty meaningless
Cruccone
On 18 February 2011 23:24, aude aude.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Heather Ford, a former Wikimedia advisory board member and researcher/writer
in South Africa has written an essay, The Missing Wikipedians about
systematic bias on English Wikipedia (especially) against new users and
topics pertinent
Heather Ford, a former Wikimedia advisory board member and researcher/writer
in South Africa has written an essay, The Missing Wikipedians about
systematic bias on English Wikipedia (especially) against new users and
topics pertinent to Africa and other diverse places/people.
As an example, she
On 18 February 2011 23:24, aude aude.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Heather Ford, a former Wikimedia advisory board member and researcher/writer
in South Africa has written an essay, The Missing Wikipedians about
systematic bias on English Wikipedia (especially) against new users and
topics pertinent
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:17 PM, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 February 2011 23:24, aude aude.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Heather Ford, a former Wikimedia advisory board member and
researcher/writer
in South Africa has written an essay, The Missing Wikipedians about
systematic bias on
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:00 PM, aude aude.w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:17 PM, geni geni...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 February 2011 23:24, aude aude.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Heather Ford, a former Wikimedia advisory board member and
researcher/writer
in South Africa has
13 matches
Mail list logo
