Fortunately inflated page view counts could still be patched from available
log files.
http://infodisiac.com/blog/2010/11/page-views-anomaly-in-october-resolved/
Erik Zachte
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
On 22 Oct 2010, at 02:02, Erik Zachte wrote:
A quick update on our inflated page view stats:
Ryan's hypothesis that deployment of the new CentralNotice banner
loader had something to do with it has been confirmed.
So those extra page views were actually internally generated requests,
The CentralNotice pages/js use client-side caching, so not ever page
view will actually spawn a new request to the squid servers.
Ryan Kaldari
On 10/22/10 4:00 PM, Michael Peel wrote:
On 22 Oct 2010, at 02:02, Erik Zachte wrote:
A quick update on our inflated page view stats:
Ryan's
A quick update on our inflated page view stats:
Ryan's hypothesis that deployment of the new CentralNotice banner
loader had something to do with it has been confirmed.
So those extra page views were actually internally generated requests,
which accessed just two new special pages in huge
This may be related to the deployment of the new CentralNotice banner
loader. An RT ticket has been opened to investigate. If so, we may need
to filter those requests from the page view stats.
Ryan Kaldari
On 10/18/10 6:16 PM, Erik Zachte wrote:
For those of you who want to follow this
that press note even
if we are sure we have beaten the record.
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:29:15 +0200
From: Erik Zachte erikzac...@infodisiac.com
Subject: [Foundation-l] Page views
To: foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Message-ID: 001e01cb6e4a$bc2a86d0$347f94...@com
Content-Type: text
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Przykuta przyk...@o2.pl wrote:
Is there any explanation for the extraordinary jump in page views this
month?
http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesPageViewsMonthly.htm
If it is not a bug[1], I think it is newsworthy
What was the day again when Google
On 18 October 2010 20:05, Mathias Schindler mathias.schind...@gmail.com wrote:
If it is not a bug[1], I think it is newsworthy
What was the day again when Google switched on the Instant feature?
Google Instant began to be rolled out on 8 September, and I think was
broadly arrived for most
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Joan Goma jrg...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any explanation for the extraordinary jump in page views this
month?
http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesPageViewsMonthly.htm
Hi Joan,
We're currently investigating. We'll update here as more info becomes
available:
For those of you who want to follow this closely:
The following two charts show daily page views as counted by our squid log
post-processing server.
Same data, with different time scales, one of 13, one for 34 months.
Oops, again with shortened urls, and text only format
For those of you who want to follow this closely:
The following two charts show daily page views as counted by our squid log
post-processing server.
Same data, with different time scales, one of 13, one for 34 months.
Is there any explanation for the extraordinary jump in page views this
month?
http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesPageViewsMonthly.htm
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
Is there any explanation for the extraordinary jump in page views this
month?
http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesPageViewsMonthly.htm
If it is not a bug[1], I think it is newsworthy
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 22:49, Przykuta przyk...@o2.pl wrote:
Is there any explanation for the extraordinary jump in page views this
month?
http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesPageViewsMonthly.htm
If it is not a bug[1], I think it is newsworthy
Given that there doesn't appear to be any jump in page views or reach
as measured by Alexa [1], I would be inclined to assume it is some
sort of a glitch with our counting infrastructure. It is hard to
imagine any simple external process creating a real 50% jump in
traffic. If I recall
I also think the seemingly extraordinary increase in page views in October
is most likely a glitch.
Compare this chart which shows long term trends in page (and image) requests
per second.
http://www.nedworks.org/~mark/reqstats/reqstats-yearly.png
16 matches
Mail list logo
