Dennis During wrote:
> Notice how easy it is to have vacuous "discussions" in the
> absence of facts about user behavior.
Query - to what "facts about user behavior" are you referring?
-Stevertigo
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikime
Notice how easy it is to have vacuous "discussions" in the absence of facts
about user behavior.
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 5:06 PM, stevertigo wrote:
> Greg wrote:
> > There are many indirect effects as well— Less search engine
> > hits means less readers means less editing means less content > an
Greg wrote:
> There are many indirect effects as well— Less search engine
> hits means less readers means less editing means less content > and probably
> less neutral content.
Ha!
In reality, one could just as well argue that less hits and less edits
might mean a *perfect article will remain pe
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Ray Saintonge wrote:
> Aryeh Gregor wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Cox, Serita
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Google's new search engine, Caffeine, is supposedly kicking Wikipedia
>>> entries further down results page. Thoughts? Comments?
>>>
>> So what? Wikipedia's
Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Cox, Serita wrote:
>
>> Google's new search engine, Caffeine, is supposedly kicking Wikipedia
>> entries further down results page. Thoughts? Comments?
>>
> So what? Wikipedia's goal isn't to get high search rankings. It's to
> be a u
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Cox, Serita wrote:
> Google's new search engine, Caffeine, is supposedly kicking Wikipedia
> entries further down results page. Thoughts? Comments?
So what? Wikipedia's goal isn't to get high search rankings. It's to
be a useful resource within its domain. If a
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Cox, Serita wrote:
> Google's new search engine, Caffeine, is supposedly kicking Wikipedia
> entries further down results page. Thoughts? Comments?
> http://software.silicon.com/applications/0,39024653,39484015,00.htm
> Thank, Serita
> ___NOTICE_
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Cox, Serita wrote:
>> Google's new search engine, Caffeine, is supposedly kicking Wikipedia
>> entries further down results page. Thoughts? Comments?
>> http://software.silicon.com/applications/0,39024653,394
2009/8/13 Cox, Serita :
> Google's new search engine, Caffeine, is supposedly kicking Wikipedia
> entries further down results page. Thoughts? Comments?
> http://software.silicon.com/applications/0,39024653,39484015,00.htm
> Thank, Serita
There is evidence that Google has pushed wikipedia down in
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:09 PM, David Goodman wrote:
> Perhaps we should try using the titles for things that other people
> use--not for g-rank, but as signs that we recognize that an
> encyclopedia is made for the readers.
Eh— It's unsolvable in some cases... People frequently use multiple
term
Perhaps we should try using the titles for things that other people
use--not for g-rank, but as signs that we recognize that an
encyclopedia is made for the readers.
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Brion Vibber wrote:
> On
On 8/13/09 12:23 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> (I went on, on IRC, to point some examples of the behavioural change
> that happened towards the end of 2007 (per my cruddy memory) where
> non-widely-linked redirects basically fell out of the google index...
> search terms like "Jesus bug" or many oth
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Cox, Serita wrote:
> Google's new search engine, Caffeine, is supposedly kicking Wikipedia
> entries further down results page. Thoughts? Comments?
> http://software.silicon.com/applications/0,39024653,39484015,00.htm
[from my comments in #wikimedia-tech the other
Google's new search engine, Caffeine, is supposedly kicking Wikipedia
entries further down results page. Thoughts? Comments?
http://software.silicon.com/applications/0,39024653,39484015,00.htm
Thank, Serita
___NOTICE
This electronic mail transmission, inc
14 matches
Mail list logo
