Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-13 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi, There is this rule; ignore all rules. There is a point to it. Particularly in situations where an injustice is likely to happen, the blind following of rules can be quite inhuman and at best an excuse for not thinking through consequences and accepting responisibility. When people are brave

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-13 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi, Andre you make a good case why ignore all rules must be used carefully. People express the opinion that Iran is the enemy and by inference Iranians cannot be trusted. This is a great example of an opinion that is detrimental to our projects. In my opinion we need an Iranian chapter as much as

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-13 Thread Mark Williamson
So we don't believe in freedom of expression? When somebody in a position of authority abuses that power and discriminates, yes, their power should be removed and possibly they should be blocked. But in the case of someone saying I vote no because this person is black, their vote should just be

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-13 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi, If people want to express themselves in a discriminatory way, they can do soelsewhere. When people vote against someone with the motivation that the person is black, then indeed we are better off without him. I am all in favour of freedom of expression, but this is not a debating club.

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-13 Thread Ray Saintonge
geni wrote: 2009/2/9 Tomasz Ganicz polime...@gmail.com: The real danger is that stewards have access to global checkuser, so they can theoretically be used to trace users when forced by secret police of an non-democratic country. However, various special forces and secret services of

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-13 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi, There are valid reasons why you might be against this candidate. However, when arguments are used that you *can not* agree with, you should speak and motivate your vote. The alternative is that people think an unacceptable position is yours. Thanks, GerardM 2009/2/13 Ray Saintonge

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-12 Thread Yann Forget
geni wrote: 2009/2/9 Ting Chen wing.phil...@gmx.de: Surely is this a prejudice. Because there is no data that support such an assumption. In the eight years since the being of Wikipedia I don't know any such case happend on any Wikimedia project. Ting Prejudice? We know Iran's record on

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-12 Thread geni
2009/2/12 Yann Forget y...@forget-me.net: And how this relate to the status of stewarship? Would you accept that someone be rejected because he is Muslim or Jew? or because he is black or white? This is exactly the same to me, i.e. not acceptable. I wasn't aware that any of those were nation

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-12 Thread Yaroslav M. Blanter
Hoi, There are people I know who put more trust in the Iranian people then in the American people. Now, it is completely unacceptable at this time to deny people from the USA the possibility to become a steward. There are many countries who are not trusted to do right. So how are we going to

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-12 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi, When people vote and do not provide arguments why it is reasonable to ignore them in circumstances like this one. In the end it is the person who decides on the outcome how certain votes are valued. We are working on consensus, this means that it is not only about simple majorities, Thanks,

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-12 Thread Yaroslav M. Blanter
I apologize for the typo in your name, I am apparently still asleep. Cheers Yaroslav Hoi, When people vote and do not provide arguments why it is reasonable to ignore them in circumstances like this one. In the end it is the person who decides on the outcome how certain votes are valued.

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-10 Thread Yaroslav M. Blanter
For a western government the cost of the PR mess is unlikely to outweigh any benefits. There are also various other issues that mean that such interference is unlikely (the CIA legally can't touch wikipedia since it is US based and I doubt any other intelligence agency wants to annoy the US).

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-10 Thread Milos Rancic
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Yaroslav M. Blanter pute...@mccme.ru wrote: But then I guess there alre already checkusers on fa.wp? Nope. Candidates were not able to get enough support; which has much more with the situation in the community than with anything else. At fa.wp candidates very

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-10 Thread Mido
it doesn't make any sense that one could think of such a reason to oppose.if you trust his abilities and good reasoning, give him the extra tools to help as he's willing to do so. Also, he promised he won't do checkuser in Iranian projects which is the most critical power to misuse. this is a

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-10 Thread Muhammad Alsebaey
I would say the likelihood of him being the target of the Iranian govt is the same as him being kidnapped by some terror group and tortured for his access, which could happen in any country... On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Mido mido.archit...@gmail.com wrote: it doesn't make any sense that

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-10 Thread Dan Rosenthal
Which is more likely to happen in some countries than others. Though, I do agree that it is a silly reason to oppose in light of his quite reasonable concessions. -Dan On Feb 10, 2009, at 5:26 AM, Muhammad Alsebaey wrote: I would say the likelihood of him being the target of the Iranian

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-09 Thread Cary Bass
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jesse (Pathoschild) wrote: Hello, This is a summary of the steward elections and confirmations so far. The elections are open February 1 to 22, at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Stewards/elections_2009 and

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-09 Thread Robert Rohde
Looking at the summary and comments, I am struck by the fact that Mardetanha [1] is getting a significant number of oppose votes from people who believe it is fundamentally unsafe for a Steward to live in Iran. Including comments that the Iranian government might arrest and torture him for his

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-09 Thread Al Tally
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Ting Chen wing.phil...@gmx.de wrote: I dislike this argument very much... You were expecting good arguments? :) -- Alex (User:Majorly) ___ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe:

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-09 Thread Nathan
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Al Tally majorly.w...@googlemail.comwrote: You were expecting good arguments? :) - On meta elections? Not me. -- Your donations keep Wikipedia running! Support the Wikimedia Foundation today: http://www.wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-09 Thread geni
2009/2/9 Ting Chen wing.phil...@gmx.de: I dislike this argument very much. People cannot choose that they are born in Iran or in China, or in the USA or Europe. Use such a trait that cannot be influence by a person against him is a kind of discrimination. True but it's based on reality rather

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-09 Thread Thomas Dalton
2009/2/9 geni geni...@gmail.com: 2009/2/9 Ting Chen wing.phil...@gmx.de: I dislike this argument very much. People cannot choose that they are born in Iran or in China, or in the USA or Europe. Use such a trait that cannot be influence by a person against him is a kind of discrimination.

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-09 Thread Ziko van Dijk
If I understand it right, Wikimedia or other stewards can trace what a single steward is doing. Even if a dictatorship forces a local steward to do something, there is the danger that this becomes public. Ziko 2009/2/9 Ting Chen wing.phil...@gmx.de Robert Rohde wrote: Looking at the summary

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-09 Thread geni
2009/2/9 Ziko van Dijk zvand...@googlemail.com: If I understand it right, Wikimedia or other stewards can trace what a single steward is doing. Even if a dictatorship forces a local steward to do something, there is the danger that this becomes public. Ziko Thats the danger for a western

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-09 Thread Ting Chen
geni schrieb: 2009/2/9 Ting Chen wing.phil...@gmx.de: I dislike this argument very much. People cannot choose that they are born in Iran or in China, or in the USA or Europe. Use such a trait that cannot be influence by a person against him is a kind of discrimination. True but

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-09 Thread Ting Chen
geni wrote: 2009/2/9 Ziko van Dijk zvand...@googlemail.com: If I understand it right, Wikimedia or other stewards can trace what a single steward is doing. Even if a dictatorship forces a local steward to do something, there is the danger that this becomes public. Ziko Thats the

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-09 Thread geni
2009/2/9 Ting Chen wing.phil...@gmx.de: Surely is this a prejudice. Because there is no data that support such an assumption. In the eight years since the being of Wikipedia I don't know any such case happend on any Wikimedia project. Ting Prejudice? We know Iran's record on human rights and

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-09 Thread oscar van dillen
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Ting Chen wing.phil...@gmx.de wrote: geni wrote: If there's any sign that a steward had misused his previlege, for what ever reason, he would instantly lost that previlege. yes indeed. if i remember correctly it was in 2005 that i removed as a steward

Re: [Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-09 Thread John Vandenberg
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/2/9 geni geni...@gmail.com: 2009/2/9 Ting Chen wing.phil...@gmx.de: I dislike this argument very much. People cannot choose that they are born in Iran or in China, or in the USA or Europe. Use such a trait that

[Foundation-l] Steward elections: summary, week one

2009-02-08 Thread Jesse (Pathoschild)
Hello, This is a summary of the steward elections and confirmations so far. The elections are open February 1 to 22, at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Stewards/elections_2009 and http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Stewards/confirm respectively. 902 unique users have participated in the elections