Re: [Foundation-l] What Wikipedia owes to Jimbo (was Re: Jimbo's Sexual Image Deletions)

2010-05-11 Thread David Goodman
thousands, yes. Even conservapedia has thousands. But millions? I have no objection to working for a profit making enterprise. But when I do, I want my share of the money. David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Tim Starling

Re: [Foundation-l] What Wikipedia owes to Jimbo (was Re: Jimbo's Sexual Image Deletions)

2010-05-11 Thread Aryeh Gregor
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 2:31 AM, David Goodman dgoodma...@gmail.com wrote: thousands, yes. Even conservapedia has thousands. But millions? I have no objection to working for a profit making enterprise. But when I do, I want my share of the money. I imagine Wikia has millions of articles, all

[Foundation-l] What Wikipedia owes to Jimbo (was Re: Jimbo's Sexual Image Deletions)

2010-05-10 Thread Tim Starling
On 10/05/10 20:51, Delirium wrote: That isn't really true, though. He recruited volunteers with the promise of the free-content license for sure, and with a sort of implicit promise of a generally free-culture / volunteer-run encyclopedia. If he had *not* promised anything, he would have