2010 02:40:06 -0700
From: Mark Williamson node...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Where do our readers come from? QA
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Message-ID:
849f98ed1001160140h20c69f6fxa5a7a22d4b81e...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type
Joan Goma hett schreven:
There are 3 phenomena acting simultaneously against the number of visits to
small projects: The bilingual effect, the size effect, and the Google
effect. For Catalan case we estimate a penalization factor of 8.3 (that
means that visits are 8.3 times less that what they
On 01/18/2010 09:29 AM, Joan Goma wrote:
There are 3 phenomena acting simultaneously against the number of visits to
small projects: The bilingual effect, the size effect, and the Google
effect. For Catalan case we estimate a penalization factor of 8.3 (that
means that visits are 8.3 times
Details on how to measure it are relatively complex. We can make a guess
because of data collected from sources available for Catalan. My mail was
just to explain the phenomena.
Figures results from: a) Surveys. Last one answered by 400 Catalan Wikipedia
readers. We use results from answer to
Дана Saturday 16 January 2010 12:25:58 Nikola Smolenski написа:
Дана Saturday 16 January 2010 10:40:06 Mark Williamson написа:
It is not surprising to me that the English Wikipedia is so popular
compared to any other in Kenya, but it is quite a bit more surprising
that Korean, Romanian,
Dear Erik,
Maybe there is a dirty Polish word looked up by many Polish pupils,
and when they Google it they come to eu.WP because a Basque word
accidentally is alike? :-)
I am looking now for the interest in the native / the English
Wikipedia in specific countries. It might be important how
Sociolinguistic situations around the world are very complex I think. In
especially former European colonies, of which Kenya is but one example, the
language of the former colonial power often has a unique position in
society.
It is not surprising to me that the English Wikipedia is so popular
Дана Saturday 16 January 2010 10:40:06 Mark Williamson написа:
It is not surprising to me that the English Wikipedia is so popular
compared to any other in Kenya, but it is quite a bit more surprising that
Korean, Romanian, Bulgarian, Lithuanian, Iranian, etc. users prefer the
English
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Erik Zachte erikzac...@infodisiac.com wrote:
Q: Nikola Smolenski / Milos Rancic
At Wikipedia Page Views By Country - Breakdown [1] and Wikipedia Page Views
By Country - Trends [2] could you include more languages (ideally all
languages)?
Some of the numbers
Дана Friday 15 January 2010 23:39:38 Erik Zachte написа:
R: Nikola Smolenski
It is obvious why Slovene Wikipedia is highly visited in Sierra Leone, and
Serbian in Suriname; URLs do matter :)
Although, I don't understand why so much. I would expect this distribution
by visitors, perhaps, but
I read all kind of confusions about funny correlations between language
versions and countries where visitors are coming from.
As I (privately) communicated with Erik, the following flaws are in the
current analysis:
* The country code AU is often used (by apnic in this case) as a placeholder
Дана Friday 15 January 2010 23:39:38 Erik Zachte написа:
Here is a much more extended version of the breakdown report [1] (for this
discussion only)
It shows per country up to 50 Wikipedia's
An extra column shows the total number of records for this country/language
(for the 6 month period)
2010/1/15 Erik Zachte erikzac...@infodisiac.com:
Very interesting observation! So people from Sierra Leone try
'sl.wikipedia.org'.
Why people from Surinam go to 'sr.wikimedia.org' is only slightly less
obvious to me, but apparently is happens
Well, Suriname’s TLD is .sr, so it is quite
I notice in that list both Belarusian Wikipedias are listed just as
Belarusian Wikipedia. It would be very informative to know which is which
and to have visitor statistics on both :-)
skype: node.ue
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Erik Zachte erikzac...@infodisiac.comwrote:
Here is a QA on
14 matches
Mail list logo
