...@gmail.com escribió:
De: Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com
Asunto: Re: [Foundation-l] Wikipedia trade mark misuse
Para: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Fecha: jueves, 17 de junio de 2010, 8:39
On 17 June 2010 11:37, Peter Gervai
grin...@gmail.com
wrote
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 17:25, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com
wrote many things.
My sidenote is that if you believe in what you say then you imply
Wikipedia, Wikimedia and everything we have with 'wiki' string in it,
and every method we use which described as 'wiki-way of web
publishing'
On 17 June 2010 11:37, Peter Gervai grin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 17:25, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com
wrote many things.
My sidenote is that if you believe in what you say then you imply
Wikipedia, Wikimedia and everything we have with 'wiki' string in it,
and
Wow, this thread just needs to end.
Nathan
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
on 6/17/10 9:47 AM, Nathan at nawr...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow, this thread just needs to end.
Nathan
Interesting, Nathan. Needs to end for whom?
Would you say the same thing if this were a live in-person discussion?
Marc Riddell
___
foundation-l
Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 15 June 2010 00:17, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
Tardises are antiquated visual whatchamacallits, but not
even remotely trademarks.
Now you are just embarrassing yourself. Check your facts:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/2352743.stm
You
On 16 June 2010 08:52, Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net wrote:
Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 15 June 2010 00:17, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
Tardises are antiquated visual whatchamacallits, but not
even remotely trademarks.
Now you are just embarrassing yourself. Check your facts:
Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 16 June 2010 08:52, Ray Saintonge sainto...@telus.net wrote:
Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 15 June 2010 00:17, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
Tardises are antiquated visual whatchamacallits, but not
even remotely trademarks.
Now you are just
Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 15 June 2010 00:20, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 June 2010 00:17, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonav...@gmail.com wrote:
You are claiming the law is complicated. But the facts are
plain and simple, and no amount of FUDD is going to support
a view
Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 13 June 2010 23:33, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonav...@gmail.com wrote:
If there is any party with dibs on Wiki, that would
be Ward Cunningham, not the WMF.
Trademark law does not include an automatic right to dibs on a mark
to the first person to use it. (At
On 15 June 2010 00:17, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonav...@gmail.com wrote:
You are claiming the law is complicated. But the facts are
plain and simple, and no amount of FUDD is going to support
a view that there is any reasonable justification (by moral
or juridifical standards) to claim WMF is
On 15 June 2010 00:17, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonav...@gmail.com wrote:
I happen to know there is an English phrase Doctor, heal
thyself.
You probably ANAL. But that doesn't stop you from FUDDing.
I'm an anal non-lawyer, at that! I may be spreading uncertainty and
doubt and something that is
On 15 June 2010 00:20, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 June 2010 00:17, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonav...@gmail.com wrote:
You are claiming the law is complicated. But the facts are
plain and simple, and no amount of FUDD is going to support
a view that there is any reasonable
Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 15 June 2010 00:17, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonav...@gmail.com wrote:
I happen to know there is an English phrase Doctor, heal
thyself.
You probably ANAL. But that doesn't stop you from FUDDing.
I'm an anal non-lawyer, at that! I may be spreading
On 15 June 2010 00:25, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not suggesting we should claim a trademark on the word wiki (it
wouldn't stand up). I'm suggesting that wiki when used as the name
of an encyclopaedia is sufficiently similar to Wikipedia to cause
confusion in the market
Jiří Hofman hofm...@aldebaran.cz wrote:
One of the Czech online news services, Aktuálně.cz ( http://aktualne.cz ) has
launched its own encyclopedia a few weeks ago. Links to the encyclopedia's
articles are used in news articles on this server. That would not be anything
strange if the
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Tim Landscheidt t...@tim-landscheidt.de
wrote:
Jiří Hofman hofm...@aldebaran.cz wrote:
You are aware of [[en:Wiki]] for a history of wikis and
WMF's part in it?
Tim
In other words, the use of wiki predates wikipedia (wikipedia gets
its name since it was a
On 13 June 2010 23:33, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonav...@gmail.com wrote:
Thomas Dalton wrote:
Dog isn't strongly associated in the public psyche with a particular
brand. Wiki is. Like I say, these are complicated issues of legal
interpretation and really should be left to the lawyers.
If
2010/6/12 Jiří Hofman hofm...@aldebaran.cz:
The community is not unanimous. Therefore I would like to ask an
international Wikipedia community for its opinion. Is it a violation of the
Wikimedia Foundation rights?
The opinion of the community (local or international) is largely
irrelevant.
19 matches
Mail list logo
