On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Nikola Smolenski smole...@eunet.rs wrote:
wiki-li...@phizz.demon.co.uk wrote:
wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
The image is in the public domain. That's the point.
Public means all public, not limited to the whims of what the boundary
of a certain
country might
2009/9/30 wiki-li...@phizz.demon.co.uk:
David Gerard wrote:
But getting back to the case in question - we're talking about the
sort of museum that's actually a government sub-department. Thus,
public domain images that the taxpayer has *already paid for*. I see
nothing whatsoever
I should have said it in my previous message : the first and foremost
priority for France, is that Government-owned museums allow visitors
who paid their entrance ticket to carry a camera and take pictures of
paintings and sculptures when the painters and sculptors died more
than 70 years ago.
In
That was not the right link. Good link :
http://web.archive.org/web/20050208203749/http://www.museeguimet.fr/pages/page_id18315_u1l2.htm
2009/9/30, Teofilo teofilow...@gmail.com:
(1)
http://web.archive.org/web/20050305062057/www.museeguimet.fr/homes/home_id20392_u1l2.htm
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Teofilo teofilow...@gmail.com wrote:
I should have said it in my previous message : the first and foremost
priority for France, is that Government-owned museums allow visitors
who paid their entrance ticket to carry a camera and take pictures of
paintings and
Marco Chiesa wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Teofilo wrote:
I should have said it in my previous message : the first and foremost
priority for France, is that Government-owned museums allow visitors
who paid their entrance ticket to carry a camera and take pictures of
paintings
wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: wiki-li...@phizz.demon.co.uk
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Tue, Sep 29, 2009 5:31 pm
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] a heads-up on Wikimedia France's adventures with
the Frenc...
-Original Message-
From: wiki-li...@phizz.demon.co.uk
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Wed, Sep 30, 2009 2:58 pm
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] a heads-up on Wikimedia France's adventures with
the Frenc...
wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
Teofilo wrote:
I should have said it in my previous message : the first and foremost
priority for France, is that Government-owned museums allow visitors
who paid their entrance ticket to carry a camera and take pictures of
paintings and sculptures when the painters and sculptors died more
-Original Message-
From: wiki-li...@phizz.demon.co.uk
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Wed, Sep 30, 2009 4:17 pm
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] a heads-up on Wikimedia France's adventures with
the Frenc...
wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: wiki-li...@phizz.demon.co.uk
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Sent: Wed, Sep 30, 2009 4:17 pm
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] a heads-up on Wikimedia France's adventures with
the Frenc...
I think everyone is probably a bit tired of this topic so this will be my last
response.
You keep positing that someone is espousing that the museums have to actively
participate in providing copies of something to someone.? Has somebody claimed
that?? If they did, it wasn't me.? I have never
But they have not changed the license to the pictures. What they have
only done is changed the rights to part of the documentation: the
basic info needed to say what it is is CC-BY-SA, which is very good,
the long explanation and provenance information is NC, which is
acceptable. I fail to see how
David Gerard wrote:
2009/9/28 wiki-li...@phizz.demon.co.uk:
From the earlier poster Teofilo:
I disagree. I think the priority is to have the full
resolution pictures of Public Domain works.
That seems to be a demand to have the highest resolution copies possible.
That sets it
2009/9/28 wiki-li...@phizz.demon.co.uk:
From the earlier poster Teofilo:
I disagree. I think the priority is to have the full
resolution pictures of Public Domain works.
That seems to be a demand to have the highest resolution copies possible.
That sets it out as a goal, not a
David Gerard wrote:
2009/9/28 wiki-li...@phizz.demon.co.uk:
From the earlier poster Teofilo:
I disagree. I think the priority is to have the full
resolution pictures of Public Domain works.
That seems to be a demand to have the highest resolution copies possible.
That
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonav...@gmail.com
wrote:
David Gerard wrote:
2009/9/28 wiki-li...@phizz.demon.co.uk:
From the earlier poster Teofilo:
I disagree. I think the priority is to have the full
resolution pictures of Public Domain works.
I thought that the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision basically was that a
reproduction like this enjoys no new copyright ?
W.J.
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
I thought that the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision basically was that a
reproduction like this enjoys no new copyright ?
I have a reproduction of Rembrandt's Toby and Anna whilst that
doesn't give the producer of the reproduction the right to stop me
making
wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 9/27/2009 1:29:03 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
wiki-li...@phizz.demon.co.uk writes:
I have a reproduction of Rembrandt's Toby and Anna whilst that
doesn't give the producer of the reproduction the right to stop me
making copies from it, it also
In a message dated 9/27/2009 5:51:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
wiki-li...@phizz.demon.co.uk writes:
I disagree. I think the priority is to have the full
resolution pictures of Public Domain works.
That seems to be a demand to have the highest resolution copies possible.
I was
21 matches
Mail list logo
