On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:06 PM, John Doe phoenixoverr...@gmail.comwrote:
...
consider that these developers run one of the top ten websites on the
I didn't try to underestimate the *importance* of wikipedia.
It just uber-ridicule that a rename of subdomain (even with all those
sub-things)
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Cetateanu
Moldovanucetatean...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:06 PM, John Doe phoenixoverr...@gmail.comwrote:
...
consider that these developers run one of the top ten websites on the
I didn't try to underestimate the *importance* of wikipedia.
Cetateanu Moldovanu wrote:
(and you still link it from
the first page of wikipedia..how ignorant can you be..).
Be polite. I would otherwise sympathise with your situation, but
DON'T-BE-RUDE.
Moreover, the first page of wikipedia is managed by wikipedians, not by
the developers...
Hello Mister Vibber,
I'm glad to see you already made a plan, I supose you know the best
mediawiki and wikipedia architecture, aren't there anybody else to execute
those points from that plan ?
Even if those points sounds havy, since the number of articlesfiles from mo
is not so high, I'm sure
Cetateanu Im going to be nice in how I say this, DO NOT DEMAND things from
developers. If dev says they are not ready THEY ARE NOT READY. please also
consider that these developers run one of the top ten websites on the
internet, so they must be doing it right for the most part or the servers
If there is one thing I've learned so far in my short life, it is that
patience is among the greatest virtues and that politeness will
usually get me much further than demands.
There are of course situations where it is necessary to be firm,
however this is not one of them considering the power
2009/7/10 Mark Williamson node...@gmail.com:
I'm not suggesting that anybody ignore the issue, just that a
different approach be taken to resolution.
I am. Nobody cares, approximately.
- d.
___
foundation-l mailing list
Okay, I can agree with that.
Mark
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:25 PM, David Gerarddger...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/10 Mark Williamson node...@gmail.com:
I'm not suggesting that anybody ignore the issue, just that a
different approach be taken to resolution.
I am. Nobody cares, approximately.
*Hi, I want to remind you that on 26 Nov 2008 **
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2008-November/047554.html*http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2008-November/047554.html
* you have promised that subdomain name mo will become mo-cyrl, it's July
now and mo is still not
Hi Cetateanu --
As replied previously, we don't yet have infrastructure for conveniently
renaming sites. Given that the site has been locked for years and
there's nothing to replace it with at mo.wikipedia.org, it's no higher
on our priority list than the other sites that have language code
On 4/6/09 3:28 PM, Casey Brown wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Cetateanu Moldovanu
cetatean...@gmail.com wrote:
* you have promised that subdomain name mo will become mo-cyrl, it's april
now and mo is still not yet renamed.*
None of the wikis have been moved yet, it's not that this
Brion Vibber hett schreven:
and there are plenty of things most members
of this list would rather see us do first. :)
Great to hear you are working on world peace...
As the developments on 'things most members of this list would like to
see' are rather slow, I'd say, you should urgently
*Hi, I want to remind you that on 26 Nov 2008 **
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2008-November/047554.html*http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2008-November/047554.html
* you have promised that subdomain name mo will become mo-cyrl, it's april
now and mo is still
It's important? That's subjective.
2009/4/6 Cetateanu Moldovanu cetatean...@gmail.com:
*Hi, I want to remind you that on 26 Nov 2008 **
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2008-November/047554.html*http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2008-November/047554.html
* you
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Mark Williamson node...@gmail.com wrote:
It's important? That's subjective.
I have zero interest in the Moldovan Wikipedia, but I would generally
say it is important that agreed upon maintenance tasks not linger for
months without end.
-Robert Rohde
2009/4/7 Mark Williamson node...@gmail.com:
It's important? That's subjective.
Isn't importance always subjective? What's your point?
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe:
16 matches
Mail list logo
