Listening to Wikipedia Weekly (71) and reading the discussions on en.WP and
nl.WP about implementation, it strucks me how inaccurate the discussions
are. I do not know what is the reason for it, a poor presentation in the
first place, a confusing terminology, hidden ideological motives... It is
So IPs can create articles on de?
Yes, I think this is switched off on en: only.
That's something I've wanted to see change for a long time.
In which direction?
Cheers
Yaroslav
___
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Yaroslav M. Blanter pute...@mccme.ru wrote:
So IPs can create articles on de?
Yes, I think this is switched off on en: only.
That's something I've wanted to see change for a long time.
In which direction?
The direction of (once again) allowing anonymous
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Sage Ross
ragesoss+wikipe...@gmail.comragesoss%2bwikipe...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Yaroslav M. Blanter pute...@mccme.ru
wrote:
So IPs can create articles on de?
Yes, I think this is switched off on en: only.
That's something
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/2/16 David Yellope sirfoz...@gmail.com:
I certainly hope that the flow is the other way. The amount of damage
that
IP editors and non auto-confirmed accounts are doing on en:WP definitely
recommends against
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/2/16 David Yellope sirfoz...@gmail.com:
As for the other part of it I'm decently sure that unless move-protect is
set on a page, that anyone can move it.
Oh, yeah, we have explicit semi-move-protection, so it
2009/2/15 P. Birken pbir...@gmail.com:
On February, 4th, all articles of the german WP had at least one
sighted revision. Since then, only pages newly created by noneditors
have to be looked at. On average, around 1.000 pages were marked for
the first time per day and these are now carried
