Dear Sir,
I received your email. I am pleased to know that you are interested in this
area.
I give you the way to invest in Vietnam effectively.
The Vietnam policy is to attract foreign investers.
So you have many opportunities to enrich in Vietnam.
You don't have to worry about the law in Vie
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Henning Schlottmann wrote:
> geni wrote:
> > 2009/2/20 Henning Schlottmann :
> >> * The responsibility for decisions of this magnitude lays with the
> >> board. WMF is a non-membership association. Don't even try to evade that
> >> responsibility by delegating it
2009/2/20 Henning Schlottmann :
> geni wrote:
>> 2009/2/20 Henning Schlottmann :
>>> * The responsibility for decisions of this magnitude lays with the
>>> board. WMF is a non-membership association. Don't even try to evade that
>>> responsibility by delegating it to the "community". Accept the
>>>
geni wrote:
> 2009/2/20 Henning Schlottmann :
>> * The responsibility for decisions of this magnitude lays with the
>> board. WMF is a non-membership association. Don't even try to evade that
>> responsibility by delegating it to the "community". Accept the
>> responsibility and act accordingly.
>
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Henning Schlottmann
wrote:
> * Ditch the dual licensing. I don't understand it. I am trained as a
> lawyer to understand about licenses and I have not the slightest idea
> how the dual licensing is supposed to work. No one I talked to -
> layperson or professional
2009/2/20 Henning Schlottmann :
> * Ditch the dual licensing. I don't understand it. I am trained as a
> lawyer to understand about licenses and I have not the slightest idea
> how the dual licensing is supposed to work. No one I talked to -
> layperson or professional - understood about it. Make a
2009/2/20 Henning Schlottmann :
> * Ditch the dual licensing. I don't understand it. I am trained as a
> lawyer to understand about licenses and I have not the slightest idea
> how the dual licensing is supposed to work. No one I talked to -
> layperson or professional - understood about it. Make a
Ryan Kaldari wrote:
> As far as anyone not subscribed to this listserv can tell, the
> proposal to migrate Wikipedia to Creative Commons is dead in the
> water.
True.
This should be quite an important issue for the Foundation. The time
frame is narrow, running out and it looks like the Foundation
2009/2/20 Thomas Dalton :
re/ the earlier comments, remember that we don't have to invent
keyword identification from scratch. There's quite a bit of stuff out
there already - I've seen a tool for writing blog posts, for example,
which automatically adds in "contextual" Wikipedia links to the end
2009/2/20 Mingli Yuan :
> Since "Songhu Hui" use Wordpress, so I just propose a technical idea to
> improve the cooperation between Wikimedia and "Songhu Hui". How about a
> keyword-link-generator to Wikipedia for Wordpress? This new Wordpress plugin
> will query Wikipedia to get a keyword list,
2009/2/20 Mingli Yuan :
> Since "Songhu Hui" use Wordpress, so I just propose a technical idea to
> improve the cooperation between Wikimedia and "Songhu Hui". How about a
> keyword-link-generator to Wikipedia for Wordpress? This new Wordpress plugin
> will query Wikipedia to get a keyword list, an
2009/2/19 Mark Williamson :
> I still hold the crown on Wikipedia-l. Whatever happened to that list,
> anyways?
Most of the people wanting to have abtruse cross-project theological
debates just took it to foundation-l :-)
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
___
First, let me demonstrate a case for the liveliness of Chinese Internet
users on knowledge sharing. It is the "Songshu Hui"( the
Squirrel-Organization http://songshuhui.net/ ), an new branding for
scientific knowledge sharing in Mainland China right now. So far about one
hundred of scientific-write
13 matches
Mail list logo
