A Wikipol is an political program. It is a collection of wiki-pages that
describe the actual stands of (webbased) political parties. The members of
the e-party can develop and update these wiki-pages by amendments.
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipol
Jos Janssen
2009/3/6 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
Politicians get quite annoyed at this stuff. In my experience they
mostly take a certain level of rubbish in their stride, but that
doesn't mean we shouldn't work to improve the situation.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7921985.stm
This
Hoi,
When the English Wikipedia is the only Wikipedia with BLP issues, I
completely agree.
Thanks,
GerardM
2009/3/6 Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com
2009/3/6 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
Politicians get quite annoyed at this stuff. In my experience they
mostly take a certain
2009/3/6 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com:
Hoi,
When the English Wikipedia is the only Wikipedia with BLP issues, I
completely agree.
It's the only Wikipedia where BLP issues significantly affect UK
politicians, which are the subject of the article.
2009/3/6 Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com:
2009/3/6 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com:
When the English Wikipedia is the only Wikipedia with BLP issues, I
completely agree.
It's the only Wikipedia where BLP issues significantly affect UK
politicians, which are the subject of
2009/3/6 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
2009/3/6 Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com:
2009/3/6 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com:
When the English Wikipedia is the only Wikipedia with BLP issues, I
completely agree.
It's the only Wikipedia where BLP issues significantly affect UK
Thomas Dalton wrote:
2009/3/6 David Gerard dger...@gmail.com:
2009/3/6 Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com:
2009/3/6 Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijs...@gmail.com:
When the English Wikipedia is the only Wikipedia with BLP
issues, I completely agree.
It's the only Wikipedia where BLP issues
2009/3/6 Cary Bass c...@wikimedia.org:
That's interesting. We should try and get some more up-to-date
stats on that - it would be useful for Wikimedia UK to have stats
like that to throw around in negotiations, etc., to show how
important we are.
For that matter, just look at the
Pharos wrote:
My experience has been that, although certainly there is room for
expansion in scientific articles on specialty topics, Wikipedia
already has much better coverage of science than any print
encyclopedias, and most basic scientific subjects are treated fairly
completely.
In
